147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17211026)
1. Use and in-hospital mortality associated with two cardiac procedures, by sex and age: national trends, 1990-2004.
Holmes JS; Kozak LJ; Owings MF
Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17211026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in Canada: 1992/93 to 2000/01.
Jamal SM; Shrive FM; Ghali WA; Knudtson ML; Eisenberg MJ;
Can J Cardiol; 2003 Jun; 19(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 12813611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current status and outcomes of coronary revascularization 1999 to 2002: 148,396 surgical and percutaneous procedures.
Mack MJ; Brown PP; Kugelmass AD; Battaglia SL; Tarkington LG; Simon AW; Culler SD; Becker ER
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 77(3):761-6; discussion 766-8. PubMed ID: 14992867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A case study of hospital closure and centralization of coronary revascularization procedures.
Hemmelgarn BR; Ghali WA; Quan H
CMAJ; 2001 May; 164(10):1431-5. PubMed ID: 11387915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical characteristics and early mortality of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting compared to percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ASCTS) and the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) Registries.
Yan BP; Clark DJ; Buxton B; Ajani AE; Smith JA; Duffy SJ; Shardey GC; Skillington PD; Farouque O; Yii M; Yap CH; Andrianopoulos N; Brennan A; Dinh D; Reid CM; ;
Heart Lung Circ; 2009 Jun; 18(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 19268632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volume-outcome relationship for coronary artery bypass grafting in an era of decreasing volume.
Ricciardi R; Virnig BA; Ogilvie JW; Dahlberg PS; Selker HP; Baxter NN
Arch Surg; 2008 Apr; 143(4):338-44; discussion 344. PubMed ID: 18427020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Canada: 1992/93 to 2000/01.
Ghali WA; Quan H; Shrive FM; Hirsch GM;
Can J Cardiol; 2003 Jun; 19(7):774-81. PubMed ID: 12813610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Narrowing the gap: early and intermediate outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft procedures in California, 1997 to 2006.
Carey JS; Danielsen B; Milliken J; Li Z; Stabile BE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 138(5):1100-7. PubMed ID: 19837215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospital discharge to other healthcare facilities: impact on in-hospital mortality.
Carey JS; Parker JP; Robertson JM; Misbach GA; Fisher AL
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Nov; 197(5):806-12. PubMed ID: 14585418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary revascularisation: results from a large, population-based cohort with first intervention 1995-2004.
Blackledge HM; Squire IB
Heart; 2009 Feb; 95(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 19001000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decreasing in-hospital mortality of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with persistent higher mortality rates in women and minorities in the United States.
Movahed MR; Hashemzadeh M; Jamal MM; Ramaraj R
J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Feb; 22(2):58-60. PubMed ID: 20124588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do operator volumes relate to clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in the Canadian health care system?
Cantor WJ; Hall R; Tu JV
Am Heart J; 2006 Apr; 151(4):902-8. PubMed ID: 16569560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in the association between age and in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: National Cardiovascular Data Registry experience.
Singh M; Peterson ED; Roe MT; Ou FS; Spertus JA; Rumsfeld JS; Anderson HV; Klein LW; Ho KK; Holmes DR
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Feb; 2(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 20031689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sex disparities in procedure use for acute myocardial infarction in the United States, 1995 to 2001.
Bertoni AG; Bonds DE; Lovato J; Goff DC; Brancati FL
Am Heart J; 2004 Jun; 147(6):1054-60. PubMed ID: 15199355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Specificity of procedure volume and in-hospital mortality association.
Allareddy V; Allareddy V; Konety BR
Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):135-9. PubMed ID: 17592302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender and age inequity in the provision of coronary revascularisation in England in the 1990s: is it getting better?
Shaw M; Maxwell R; Rees K; Ho D; Oliver S; Ben-Shlomo Y; Ebrahim S
Soc Sci Med; 2004 Dec; 59(12):2499-507. PubMed ID: 15474204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decline in the nationwide trends in in-hospital mortality of patients undergoing multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention.
Movahed MR; Ramaraj R; Jamal MM; Hashemzadeh M
J Invasive Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 21(8):388-90. PubMed ID: 19652251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gender differences in hospital mortality and use of percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: microsimulation analysis of the 1999 nationwide French hospitals database.
Milcent C; Dormont B; Durand-Zaleski I; Steg PG
Circulation; 2007 Feb; 115(7):833-9. PubMed ID: 17309933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors affecting post minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting incidence of myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality of cardiac origin.
Kofidis T; Gerd Paeschke H; Lichtenberg A; Emmert M; Woitek F; Didilis V; Haverich A; Klima U
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 8(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 18786942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Persistent sex difference in hospital outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the New York State reporting system.
Srinivas VS; Garg S; Negassa A; Bang JY; Monrad ES
J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 19(6):265-8. PubMed ID: 17541128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
