BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17211377)

  • 1. FDA's cloning report bypasses ethics, exposes European dilemma.
    Vermij P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 17211377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Animal cloning and the FDA--the risk assessment paradigm under public scrutiny.
    Rudenko L; Matheson JC; Sundlof SF
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 17211392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FDA on transgenic animals--a dog's breakfast?
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 18259164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FDA reaches final conclusion that food from clones is safe.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2008 Mar; 232(5):667. PubMed ID: 18380061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cloned animal products in the human food chain: FDA should protect American consumers.
    Butler JE
    Food Drug Law J; 2009; 64(3):473-501. PubMed ID: 19999640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ethics of biotechnology.
    Lenoir N
    J Biolaw Bus; 2000; Suppl.():111-5. PubMed ID: 12739544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Food from cloned animals is part of our brave old world.
    Miller HI
    Trends Biotechnol; 2007 May; 25(5):201-3. PubMed ID: 17374411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical device safety: FDA's postmarket transformation initiative.
    Schultz D
    Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(3):593-6. PubMed ID: 17915401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On FDA's front lines. Investigators protect public.
    Stehlin D
    FDA Consum; 1992 Jun; 26(5):14-9. PubMed ID: 10118933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reason and repugnance.
    Callahan D; Magnus D
    Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2001; ():6-7. PubMed ID: 15584188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Animal cloning and food safety.
    Bren L
    FDA Consum; 2007; 41(2):32-5. PubMed ID: 17582865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No "killer tomatoes": easing federal regulation of genetically engineered plants.
    Beach JE
    Food Drug Law J; 1998; 53(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 11795332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
    Lusk JL; Rozan A
    Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetically engineered animals in the food supply.
    Burns K
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2008 Nov; 233(9):1370-3. PubMed ID: 18980485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Europe does not want to eat cloned food].
    Nau JY
    Rev Med Suisse; 2008 Dec; 4(183):2709. PubMed ID: 19157291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regulators equivocate on safety of clones.
    Powell K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Dec; 21(12):1415-6. PubMed ID: 14647311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate".
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):959. PubMed ID: 12355099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FDA'S food ingredient approval process: Safety assurance based on scientific assessment.
    Rulis AM; Levitt JA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 18983884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Promoting public health and protecting consumers in a global economy: an overview of HHS/FDA's international activities.
    Kelly DP; Bachorik LL
    Food Drug Law J; 2005; 60(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 16304741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The FDA's reaction to corporate compliance audits.
    Shroff AP
    Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(2):221-3. PubMed ID: 11820199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.