These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17211396)
1. Japan's novelty grace period solves the dilemma of 'publish and perish'. Tessensohn JA; Yamamoto S Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 17211396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Patents and the research exemption. Resnik DB Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5608):821-2. PubMed ID: 12574602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Who owns federally funded research? The Supreme court and the Bayh-Dole act. Kesselheim AS; Rajkumar R N Engl J Med; 2011 Sep; 365(13):1167-9. PubMed ID: 21879888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Patent law. New rules for German professors. Kilger C; Bartenbach K Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5596):1173-5. PubMed ID: 12424355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. No room for experiment: the Federal Circuit's narrow construction of the experimental use defense. Ludwig SP; Chumney JC Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Apr; 21(4):453. PubMed ID: 12665827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Japan's innovators take patent deals to court. Cyranoski D Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6908):657. PubMed ID: 12384663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ownership at too high a price? Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):953. PubMed ID: 12949537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protecting rights to early-stage technology. Shuster MJ; Su H; Blaug S Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):701-3. PubMed ID: 12776151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Technology transfer at US universities: seeking public benefit from the results of basic research. Goodwin CD Technol Health Care; 1996 Sep; 4(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 8931243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Publish and perish: what constitutes a bar under the patent laws. Teitelbaum R; Cohen MS Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Nov; 22(11):1449-51. PubMed ID: 15529168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intellectual property. Indian government hopes bill will stimulate innovation. Bhattacharjee Y Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5863):556. PubMed ID: 18239095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Transferring innovation. Kesan JP Fordham Law Rev; 2009 Apr; 77(5):2169-223. PubMed ID: 19431909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biotechs sue Columbia over fourth Axel patent. Howard K Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):955-6. PubMed ID: 12949538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Science and the law. Patent swords and shields. Eisenberg RS Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1018-9. PubMed ID: 12586927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bungled law threatens Italian tech transfer. Meldolesi A Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Nov; 19(11):996-7. PubMed ID: 11689829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Patent rights and the free research. The boundary between basic research and private sector is not longer razor-sharp]. Westerlund L Lakartidningen; 2005 Sep 26-Oct 2; 102(39):2737. PubMed ID: 16245544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA patents and diagnostics: not a pretty picture. Carbone J; Gold ER; Sampat B; Chandrasekharan S; Knowles L; Angrist M; Cook-Deegan R Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Aug; 28(8):784-91. PubMed ID: 20697400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]