128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1721145)
1. A method for analysis of the local atrial evoked response for determination of atrial capture in permanent pacing systems.
Curtis AB; Maas SM; Domijan A; Keim SG; Duran A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 1):1576-81. PubMed ID: 1721145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new pacemaker algorithm for continuous capture verification and automatic threshold determination: elimination of pacemaker afterpotential utilizing a triphasic charge balancing system.
Feld GK; Love CJ; Camerlo J; Marsella R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Feb; 15(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 1372416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new algorithm for minimizing pacemaker polarization artifact: universally applicable in permanent pacing systems.
Curtis AB; Vance F; Quist SM; Domijan A; Keim SG; Duran A; Miller K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):1803-8. PubMed ID: 1721179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic reduction of stimulus polarization artifact for accurate evaluation of ventricular evoked responses.
Curtis AB; Vance F; Miller K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Apr; 14(4 Pt 1):529-37. PubMed ID: 1710058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance evaluation of a right atrial automatic capture verification algorithm using two different sensing configurations.
Sperzel J; Goetze S; Kennergren C; Biffi M; Brooke MJ; Vireca E; Saha S; Schubert B; Butter C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 May; 32(5):579-87. PubMed ID: 19422578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical validation of new pacing-sensing configurations for atrial automatic capture verification in pacemakers.
Butter C; Hartung WM; Kay GN; Willems R; Zhang G; Lang DJ; Fleck E
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Oct; 12(10):1104-8. PubMed ID: 11699516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristic variation in evoked potential amplitude with changes in pacing stimulus strength.
Curtis AB; Vance F; Miller-Shifrin K
Am J Cardiol; 1990 Aug; 66(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 2386117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atrial evoked response integral for automatic capture verification in atrial pacing.
Boriani G; Biffi M; Cameron D; Datteri S; Snell J; Holmström N; Park E; Bornzin GA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):248-52. PubMed ID: 12687822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Alternate methods for the determination of atrial capture threshold utilizing the telemetered intracardiac electrogram.
Feuer JM; Florio J; Shandling AH
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Oct; 13(10):1254-60. PubMed ID: 1701540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atrial sensing performance of the single-lead VDD pacemaker during exercise.
Varriale P; Chryssos BE
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Dec; 22(7):1854-7. PubMed ID: 8245339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atrial capture detection with endocardial electrodes.
Livingston AR; Callaghan FJ; Byrd CL; Heemels JP; Hollander P; Van Mechelen R; Chappin JJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1770-6. PubMed ID: 2463546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Muscle noise effects on atrial evoked response sensing: implications on atrial auto-threshold and auto-capture determination.
Tse HF; Saha S; Garg A; Bohn D; Lee YL; Lau CP
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2011 Apr; 34(4):460-6. PubMed ID: 21208231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acute effects of a class IA antiarrhythmic drug on the ventricular evoked response amplitude in patients with cardiac pacemakers.
Schuchert A; Meinertz T
Cardiology; 2000; 94(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 11173781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing automatic threshold tracking for continuous capture verification: a single-center prospective study.
Verma PK; Sharma JK; Khan IA; Bali HK; Varma JS; Bhargava M; Sharma YP; Grover A
Indian Heart J; 2001; 53(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 11759937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of two different evoked response sensing methods for automatic capture detection in the left ventricle.
Goetze S; Sperzel J; Biffi M; Sathaye A; Brooke MJ; Doelger A; Schubert B; Butter C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jul; 30(7):865-73. PubMed ID: 17584268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual chamber pacing with a single lead system: initial clinical results.
Rey JL; el Ghelbazouri F; Tribouilloy C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1777-9. PubMed ID: 8945039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of pacemaker automatic capture management and atrioventricular interval extension algorithm.
Chen KP; Xu G; Wu S; Tang B; Wang L; Zhang S;
Europace; 2013 Mar; 15(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 23243132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Left atrial and ventricular epicardial dual chamber pacing through a left lateral thoracotomy to treat pediatric complete atrioventricular block].
Li XM; Zhang Y; Pan GY; Liu HJ; Li HY; Wu QY
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 51(8):578-83. PubMed ID: 24225287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduction of the pace polarization artefact for capture detection applications by a tri-phasic stimulation pulse.
Sutton R; Fröhlig G; de Voogt WG; Goethals M; Hintringer F; Kennergren C; Scanu P; Guilleman D; Treese N; Hartung WM; Stammwitz E; Muetstege A;
Europace; 2004 Nov; 6(6):570-9. PubMed ID: 15519260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uni- and bipolar pacing threshold measurements with capturecontrol, a new automatic pacemaker function for capture verification. Comparison of the automatic and the manual pacing threshold measurement.
Schuchert A; Meinertz T
Cardiology; 1999; 92(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 10754353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
