BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17211504)

  • 1. Fracture resistance of various temporary crown materials.
    Yilmaz A; Baydaş S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 17211504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing preparation design for metal-free composite resin crowns.
    Ohlmann B; Gruber R; Eickemeyer G; Rammelsberg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18762033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials.
    Guler AU; Yilmaz F; Kulunk T; Guler E; Kurt S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 16046965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of surface condition and storage time on the repairability of temporary crown and fixed partial denture materials.
    Balkenhol M; Meyer M; Michel K; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):861-72. PubMed ID: 18691795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of PMMA and resin matrix composite-based interim FPD materials.
    Lang R; Rosentritt M; Behr M; Handel G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):381-4. PubMed ID: 12956492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of repair methods for ceramic-fused-to-metal crowns.
    Ozcan M; van der Sleen JM; Kurunmäki H; Vallittu PK
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(5):283-8. PubMed ID: 16958728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of two different methods and materials used to repair polycarbonate crowns.
    Yilmaz A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 17277833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro study of edge-strength of provisional polymer-based crown and fixed partial denture materials.
    Kim SH; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1570-3. PubMed ID: 17706276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of matrix type on surface roughness of three resins for provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures.
    Ayuso-Montero R; Martinez-Gomis J; Lujan-Climent M; Salsench J; Peraire M
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 19054307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of two methods of reinforcement on the fracture strength of interim fixed partial dentures.
    Fahmy NZ; Sharawi A
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):512-20. PubMed ID: 19432757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative in vitro study of the load at fracture of all-ceramic crowns with various thicknesses of In-Ceram core.
    Gokce S; Celik-Bagci E; Turkyilmaz I
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 18473023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short glass fiber-reinforced composite with a semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix for temporary crowns and bridges.
    Garoushi SK; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jan; 9(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 18176644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term effects of storage and thermal cycling on the marginal adaptation of provisional resin crowns: a pilot study.
    Ehrenberg D; Weiner GI; Weiner S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 16543021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of metal primers on bond strength of resin cements to base metals.
    Fonseca RG; de Almeida JG; Haneda IG; Adabo GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 19328279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of aluminium oxide and lithium disilicate-based crowns using different luting cements: an in vitro study.
    Al-Wahadni AM; Hussey DL; Grey N; Hatamleh MM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 19279972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials.
    Young HM; Smith CT; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 11208201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.
    Pinzón LM; Frey GN; Winkler MM; Tate WH; Burgess JO; Powers JM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.