These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1721188)

  • 1. Limitations of the countershock dose response: a study of transthoracic current.
    Wesley RC; Morgan D; Zimmerman D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):1855-9. PubMed ID: 1721188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: reappraisal of the "defibrillation threshold" concept.
    Davy JM; Fain ES; Dorian P; Winkle RA
    Am Heart J; 1987 Jan; 113(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3799444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transesophageal defibrillation: animal studies and preliminary clinical observations.
    Cohen TJ; Chin MC; Oliver DG; Scheinman MM; Griffin JC
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jun; 16(6):1285-92. PubMed ID: 7686658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Adgey AA
    Br Heart J; 1991 Jun; 65(6):311-6. PubMed ID: 2054239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transepicardial defibrillation dose response: current versus energy.
    Wesley RC; Farkhani F; Porzio D; Kouri J; Resh W; Zimmerman D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jan; 16(1 Pt 2):193-7. PubMed ID: 7681570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biphasic waveform external defibrillation thresholds for spontaneous ventricular fibrillation secondary to acute ischemia.
    Walcott GP; Killingsworth CR; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Jan; 39(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 11788232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Truncated biphasic pulses for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Bardy GH; Gliner BE; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Jones GK; Anderson J; Troutman C; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1995 Mar; 91(6):1768-74. PubMed ID: 7882486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The defibrillation threshold: a comparison of anesthetics and measurement methods.
    Gill RM; Sweeney RJ; Reid PR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Apr; 16(4 Pt 1):708-14. PubMed ID: 7683796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations.
    Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU
    Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a new defibrillation pathway--the tongue-epigastric route. I. Experimental studies in dogs.
    Kerber RE; Hoyt R; Aronson A; Kieso R; Melton J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Nov; 2(5):966-72. PubMed ID: 6630773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of time to defibrillation and subthreshold preshocks on defibrillation success in pigs.
    Fujimura O; Jones DL; Klein GJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Feb; 12(2):358-65. PubMed ID: 2468146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current-based versus energy-based ventricular defibrillation: a prospective study.
    Lerman BB; DiMarco JP; Haines DE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Nov; 12(5):1259-64. PubMed ID: 3170969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system.
    Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal stability and precision of ventricular defibrillation threshold data.
    Babbs CF; Whistler SJ; Yim GK
    Am J Physiol; 1978 Nov; 235(5):H553-8. PubMed ID: 31797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks.
    Szili-Torok T; Theuns D; Verblaauw T; Scholten M; Kimman GJ; Res J; Jordaens L
    Acta Cardiol; 2002 Oct; 57(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 12405569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential benefit of transesophageal defibrillation: an experimental evaluation.
    Mischke K; Schimpf T; Knackstedt C; Zarse M; Eickholt C; Plisiene J; Frechen D; Gramley F; Schauerte P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Jul; 24(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 16787798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pericardial effusion increases defibrillation energy requirement.
    Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jun; 16(6):1227-30. PubMed ID: 7686649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fourier analysis of ventricular fibrillation and synchronization of DC countershocks in defibrillation.
    Carlisle EJ; Allen JD; Bailey A; Kernohan WG; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    J Electrocardiol; 1988 Nov; 21(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 3241145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic evaluation of the determinants of defibrillation efficacy.
    Nanthakumar K; Newman D; Paquette M; Dorian P
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Jan; 2(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 15851263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms.
    Dixon EG; Tang AS; Wolf PD; Meador JT; Fine MJ; Calfee RV; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1987 Nov; 76(5):1176-84. PubMed ID: 3665001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.