421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17212072)
1. Fracture behavior of structurally compromised non-vital maxillary premolars restored using experimental fiber reinforced composite crowns.
Fokkinga WA; Kreulen CM; Le Bell-Rönnlöf AM; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK; Creugers NH
Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):326-32. PubMed ID: 17212072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ex vivo fracture resistance of direct resin composite complete crowns with and without posts on maxillary premolars.
Fokkinga WA; Le Bell AM; Kreulen CM; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK; Creugers NH
Int Endod J; 2005 Apr; 38(4):230-7. PubMed ID: 15810973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro fracture behavior of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems.
Fokkinga WA; Kreulen CM; Le Bell-Rönnlöf AM; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK; Creugers NH
Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 16776775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin.
Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):731-6. PubMed ID: 17614187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of post type and length on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
McLaren JD; McLaren CI; Yaman P; Bin-Shuwaish MS; Dennison JD; McDonald NJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 19231569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of posts on the fracture resistance of load-cycled endodontically-treated premolars restored with direct composite resin.
Hajizadeh H; Namazikhah MS; Moghaddas MJ; Ghavamnasiri M; Majidinia S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):10-7. PubMed ID: 19430621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.
Solomon CS; Osman YI
SADJ; 2011 Jun; 66(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 23193862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro fracture resistance of glass-fiber and cast metal posts with different lengths.
Giovani AR; Vansan LP; de Sousa Neto MD; Paulino SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 19231570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with flared root canals and restored with different post systems.
Maccari PC; Cosme DC; Oshima HM; Burnett LH; Shinkai RS
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(1):30-6; discussion 37. PubMed ID: 17244147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts.
Newman MP; Yaman P; Dennison J; Rafter M; Billy E
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 12690348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars.
Bolhuis P; de Gee A; Feilzer A
Quintessence Int; 2004 Sep; 35(8):657-67. PubMed ID: 15366533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of different all-ceramic crown system on fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with and without glass fiber posts.
Salameh Z; Sorrentino R; Ounsi HF; Goracci C; Tashkandi E; Tay FR; Ferrari M
J Endod; 2007 Jul; 33(7):848-51. PubMed ID: 17804327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The fracture behavior of premolar teeth with class II cavities restored by both direct composite restorations and endodontic post systems.
Nothdurft FP; Seidel E; Gebhart F; Naumann M; Motter PJ; Pospiech PR
J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 18430506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts.
Naumann M; Preuss A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 16464492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns.
Hayashi M; Takahashi Y; Imazato S; Ebisu S
Dent Mater; 2006 May; 22(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 16171857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.
Zhi-Yue L; Yu-Xing Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 12690349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Customized fiber glass posts. Fatigue and fracture resistance.
Costa RG; De Morais EC; Campos EA; Michel MD; Gonzaga CC; Correr GM
Am J Dent; 2012 Feb; 25(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 22558690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns.
Forberger N; Göhring TN
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 18922255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
