BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17213941)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of a bioluminescent bacterial assay in terrestrial ecotoxicity testing.
    Trott D; Dawson JJ; Killham KS; Miah MR; Wilson MJ; Paton GI
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Jan; 9(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 17213941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of bioassays by testing whole soil and their water extract from contaminated sites.
    Leitgib L; Kálmán J; Gruiz K
    Chemosphere; 2007 Jan; 66(3):428-34. PubMed ID: 16860849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An ecotoxicity assessment of contaminated forest soils from the Kola Peninsula.
    Paton GI; Viventsova E; Kumpene J; Wilson MJ; Weitz HJ; Dawson JJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Feb; 355(1-3):106-17. PubMed ID: 15935449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the toxicity of two soils from Jales Mine (Portugal) using aquatic bioassays.
    Loureiro S; Ferreira AL; Soares AM; Nogueira AJ
    Chemosphere; 2005 Oct; 61(2):168-77. PubMed ID: 16084560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The application of bioassays as indicators of petroleum-contaminated soil remediation.
    Płaza G; Nałecz-Jawecki G; Ulfig K; Brigmon RL
    Chemosphere; 2005 Apr; 59(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 15722101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ecotoxicity monitoring of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil during bioremediation: a case study.
    Hubálek T; Vosáhlová S; Matejů V; Kovácová N; Novotný C
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17106791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of bioassays for assessment of water-extractable ecotoxic potential of soils.
    Maxam G; Rila JP; Dott W; Eisentraeger A
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2000 Mar; 45(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 10702342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review on advantages of implementing luminescence inhibition test (Vibrio fischeri) for acute toxicity prediction of chemicals.
    Parvez S; Venkataraman C; Mukherji S
    Environ Int; 2006 Feb; 32(2):265-8. PubMed ID: 16188318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soil solution extraction techniques for microbial ecotoxicity testing: a comparative evaluation.
    Tiensing T; Preston S; Strachan N; Paton GI
    J Environ Monit; 2001 Feb; 3(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 11253026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomonitoring of the genotoxic potential of aqueous extracts of soils and bottom ash resulting from municipal solid waste incineration, using the comet and micronucleus tests on amphibian (Xenopus laevis) larvae and bacterial assays (Mutatox and Ames tests).
    Mouchet F; Gauthier L; Mailhes C; Jourdain MJ; Ferrier V; Triffault G; Devaux A
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Feb; 355(1-3):232-46. PubMed ID: 16442436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bioassays for evaluating the water-extractable genotoxic and toxic potential of soils polluted by metal smelters.
    Vidic T; Lah B; Berden-Zrimec M; Marinsek-Logar R
    Environ Toxicol; 2009 Oct; 24(5):472-83. PubMed ID: 18973278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High throughput kinetic Vibrio fischeri bioluminescence inhibition assay for study of toxic effects of nanoparticles.
    Mortimer M; Kasemets K; Heinlaan M; Kurvet I; Kahru A
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Aug; 22(5):1412-7. PubMed ID: 18400463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toxicity of metals and organic chemicals evaluated with bioluminescence assays.
    Ren S; Frymier PD
    Chemosphere; 2005 Feb; 58(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 15620747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microbial bioassays to assess the toxicity of solid-associated contaminants.
    Rönnpagel K; Liss W; Ahlf W
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1995 Jul; 31(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 8521786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the bioluminescent bacterium Vibrio harveyi to detect biohazardous chemicals in soil and water extractions with and without acid.
    Thomulka KW; Lange JH
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1995 Nov; 32(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 8575367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toxicity assessment of organic pollutants: reliability of bioluminescence inhibition assay and univariate QSAR models using freshly prepared Vibrio fischeri.
    Parvez S; Venkataraman C; Mukherji S
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Oct; 22(7):1806-13. PubMed ID: 18701087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of bioassays for the ecotoxicity assessment of contaminated soils.
    Fernández MD; Babín M; Tarazona JV
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 599():235-62. PubMed ID: 19882290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of toxicity of the untreated and treated olive mill wastewaters and soil irrigated by using microbiotests.
    Mekki A; Dhouib A; Feki F; Sayadi S
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2008 Mar; 69(3):488-95. PubMed ID: 17521725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid screening for soil ecotoxicity with a battery of luminescent bacteria tests.
    Heinlaan M; Kahru A; Kasemets K; Kurvet I; Waterlot C; Sepp K; Dubourguier HC; Douay F
    Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Mar; 35(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 17411358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resilience of the rhizosphere Pseudomonas and ammonia-oxidizing bacterial populations during phytoextraction of heavy metal polluted soil with poplar.
    Frey B; Pesaro M; Rüdt A; Widmer F
    Environ Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 10(6):1433-49. PubMed ID: 18279346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.