BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17214952)

  • 1. Use of mixture distributions to deconvolute the behavior of "hits" and controls in high-throughput screening data.
    Buxser S; Chapman DL
    Anal Biochem; 2007 Feb; 361(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17214952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medicinal chemistry tools: making sense of HTS data.
    Kolossov E; Lemon A
    Eur J Med Chem; 2006 Feb; 41(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16368163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying actives from HTS data sets: practical approaches for the selection of an appropriate HTS data-processing method and quality control review.
    Shun TY; Lazo JS; Sharlow ER; Johnston PA
    J Biomol Screen; 2011 Jan; 16(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 21160066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. HTS promiscuity analyses for accelerating decision making.
    Böcker A; Bonneau PR; Edwards PJ
    J Biomol Screen; 2011 Aug; 16(7):765-74. PubMed ID: 21680863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Novel statistical approach for primary high-throughput screening hit selection.
    Yan SF; Asatryan H; Li J; Zhou Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1784-90. PubMed ID: 16309285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using clustering techniques to improve hit selection in high-throughput screening.
    Gagarin A; Makarenkov V; Zentilli P
    J Biomol Screen; 2006 Dec; 11(8):903-14. PubMed ID: 17092911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Which aspects of HTS are empirically correlated with downstream success?
    Bender A; Bojanic D; Davies JW; Crisman TJ; Mikhailov D; Scheiber J; Jenkins JL; Deng Z; Hill WA; Popov M; Jacoby E; Glick M
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 18428086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical analysis of systematic errors in high-throughput screening.
    Kevorkov D; Makarenkov V
    J Biomol Screen; 2005 Sep; 10(6):557-67. PubMed ID: 16103415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rethinking molecular similarity: comparing compounds on the basis of biological activity.
    Petrone PM; Simms B; Nigsch F; Lounkine E; Kutchukian P; Cornett A; Deng Z; Davies JW; Jenkins JL; Glick M
    ACS Chem Biol; 2012 Aug; 7(8):1399-409. PubMed ID: 22594495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alternative statistical parameter for high-throughput screening assay quality assessment.
    Sui Y; Wu Z
    J Biomol Screen; 2007 Mar; 12(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 17218666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning from the data: mining of large high-throughput screening databases.
    Yan SF; King FJ; He Y; Caldwell JS; Zhou Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2381-95. PubMed ID: 17125181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhanced HTS hit selection via a local hit rate analysis.
    Posner BA; Xi H; Mills JE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2202-10. PubMed ID: 19795815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistics and decision making in high-throughput screening.
    Coma I; Herranz J; Martin J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 565():69-106. PubMed ID: 19551358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An empirical process for the design of high-throughput screening deck filters.
    Pearce BC; Sofia MJ; Good AC; Drexler DM; Stock DA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1060-8. PubMed ID: 16711725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Elucidation of structure-activity relationship pathways in biological screening data.
    Wawer M; Peltason L; Bajorath J
    J Med Chem; 2009 Feb; 52(4):1075-80. PubMed ID: 19140668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolution of microarrayed compound screening.
    Hoever M; Zbinden P
    Drug Discov Today; 2004 Apr; 9(8):358-65. PubMed ID: 15081963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical molecular design: a tool to follow up hits from small-molecule screening.
    Lindgren AE; Larsson A; Linusson A; Elofsson M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1056():169-88. PubMed ID: 24306873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practical outcomes of applying ensemble machine learning classifiers to High-Throughput Screening (HTS) data analysis and screening.
    Simmons K; Kinney J; Owens A; Kleier DA; Bloch K; Argentar D; Walsh A; Vaidyanathan G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2196-206. PubMed ID: 18983143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel trends in high-throughput screening.
    Mayr LM; Bojanic D
    Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2009 Oct; 9(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 19775937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved statistical methods for hit selection in high-throughput screening.
    Brideau C; Gunter B; Pikounis B; Liaw A
    J Biomol Screen; 2003 Dec; 8(6):634-47. PubMed ID: 14711389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.