These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17215349)

  • 1. A consensus view of protein dynamics.
    Rueda M; Ferrer-Costa C; Meyer T; Pérez A; Camps J; Hospital A; Gelpí JL; Orozco M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jan; 104(3):796-801. PubMed ID: 17215349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structural biology. Learning to speak the language of proteins.
    Jones DT
    Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5649):1347-8. PubMed ID: 14631028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations.
    Guvench O; MacKerell AD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 443():63-88. PubMed ID: 18446282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polarizable and non-polarizable force fields: Protein folding, unfolding, and misfolding.
    Kamenik AS; Handle PH; Hofer F; Kahler U; Kraml J; Liedl KR
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Nov; 153(18):185102. PubMed ID: 33187403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A large-scale comparison of computational models on the residue flexibility for NMR-derived proteins.
    Zhang H; Shi H; Hanlon M
    Protein Pept Lett; 2012 Feb; 19(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 21933137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some practical approaches to treating electrostatic polarization of proteins.
    Ji C; Mei Y
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Sep; 47(9):2795-803. PubMed ID: 24883956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Atomistic Force Fields for Proteins.
    Best RB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():3-19. PubMed ID: 31396897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NMR refinement and peptide folding using the GROMACS software.
    Sinelnikova A; Spoel DV
    J Biomol NMR; 2021 May; 75(4-5):143-149. PubMed ID: 33778935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biochemistry. How do proteins interact?
    Boehr DD; Wright PE
    Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1429-30. PubMed ID: 18556537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geometry, energetics, and dynamics of hydrogen bonds in proteins: structural information derived from NMR scalar couplings.
    Gsponer J; Hopearuoho H; Cavalli A; Dobson CM; Vendruscolo M
    J Am Chem Soc; 2006 Nov; 128(47):15127-35. PubMed ID: 17117864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modern protein force fields behave comparably in molecular dynamics simulations.
    Price DJ; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Aug; 23(11):1045-57. PubMed ID: 12116391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long dynamics simulations of proteins using atomistic force fields and a continuum representation of solvent effects: calculation of structural and dynamic properties.
    Li X; Hassan SA; Mehler EL
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(3):464-84. PubMed ID: 15959866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural analysis of protein dynamics by MD simulations and NMR spin-relaxation.
    Trbovic N; Kim B; Friesner RA; Palmer AG
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(2):684-94. PubMed ID: 17975832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conformational Dynamics of Two Natively Unfolded Fragment Peptides: Comparison of the AMBER and CHARMM Force Fields.
    Chen W; Shi C; MacKerell AD; Shen J
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jun; 119(25):7902-10. PubMed ID: 26020564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynameomics: a comprehensive database of protein dynamics.
    van der Kamp MW; Schaeffer RD; Jonsson AL; Scouras AD; Simms AM; Toofanny RD; Benson NC; Anderson PC; Merkley ED; Rysavy S; Bromley D; Beck DA; Daggett V
    Structure; 2010 Mar; 18(4):423-35. PubMed ID: 20399180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward a structure determination method for biomineral-associated protein using combined solid- state NMR and computational structure prediction.
    Masica DL; Ash JT; Ndao M; Drobny GP; Gray JJ
    Structure; 2010 Dec; 18(12):1678-87. PubMed ID: 21134646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative stability of protein structures determined by X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy: a molecular dynamics simulation study.
    Fan H; Mark AE
    Proteins; 2003 Oct; 53(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 12945054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment: how much can NOEs actually tell us?
    Zagrovic B; van Gunsteren WF
    Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 16425239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy.
    Kuhlman B; Dantas G; Ireton GC; Varani G; Stoddard BL; Baker D
    Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5649):1364-8. PubMed ID: 14631033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomolecular structure refinement using the GROMOS simulation software.
    Schmid N; Allison JR; Dolenc J; Eichenberger AP; Kunz AP; van Gunsteren WF
    J Biomol NMR; 2011 Nov; 51(3):265-81. PubMed ID: 21858640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.