BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17215567)

  • 1. Comparing concurrent versus fixed parameter equating with common items: using the dichotomous and partial credit models in a mixed-item format test.
    Taherbhai HM; Seo DY
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 17215567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expanding an existing multiple choice test with a mixed format test: simulation study on sample size and item recovery in concurrent calibration.
    Paek I; Young MJ
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(4):394-406. PubMed ID: 17068379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
    He Q; Wheadon C
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):409-34. PubMed ID: 12077465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-equating: a simulation study based on a large scale assessment model.
    Taherbhai HM; Young MJ
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(3):301-18. PubMed ID: 15243175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
    Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Partial credit model and pivot anchoring.
    Bode RK
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(1):78-95. PubMed ID: 12000858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of factors affecting test equating in latent trait theory.
    Suanthong S; Schumacker RE; Beyerlein MM
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 12023556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binary items and beyond: a simulation of computer adaptive testing using the Rasch partial credit model.
    Lange R
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):81-104. PubMed ID: 18180552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validating standard setting with a modified nedelsky procedure through common item test equating.
    Smith RM; Gross LJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 9661719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
    Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of data collection design, linking method, and sample size on vertical scaling using the Rasch model.
    Paek I; Young MJ; Yi Q
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(3):229-48. PubMed ID: 18753693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing screening approaches to investigate stability of common items in Rasch equating.
    Arce-Ferrer AJ
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 18180550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rasch simultaneous vertical equating for measuring reading growth.
    Lee OK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 12700428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An eigenvector method for estimating item parameters of the dichotomous and polytomous Rasch models.
    Garner M
    J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(2):107-28. PubMed ID: 12011497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Study of Rasch, partial credit, and rating scale model parameter recovery in WINSTEPS and jMetrik.
    Meyer JP; Hailey E
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 23234828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overcoming vertical equating complications in the calibration of an integer ability scale for measuring outcomes of a teaching experiment.
    Koukkoufis A; Williams J
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(3):281-304. PubMed ID: 18753696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test equating in the presence of DIF items.
    Chu KL; Kamata A
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):342-54. PubMed ID: 15942075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parameter recovery for the partial credit model using MULTILOG.
    Choi SW; Cook KF; Dodd BG
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):114-42. PubMed ID: 9661717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.