These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The ethics of the new reproductive technologies. Schiedermayer DL Christ Med Soc J; 1988; 19(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11649258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New reproductive technologies: a report from Argentina. Sommer SE Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 11651369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The fallopian tube and in vitro fertilization. Yee B Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 49(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 16456341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. ; Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Pregnancy following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer and gamete intrafallopian transfer]. Zhang LZ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1988 May; 23(3):130-1. PubMed ID: 3197468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted reproductive technologies. Shapiro SS Am Clin Lab; 1990 Oct; 9(13):17-20. PubMed ID: 10148250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assisted reproductive technologies at the UNC hospitals. An update. Talbert LM; Hammond MG; Shabanowitz R; Bailey L N C Med J; 1990 Oct; 51(10):501-4. PubMed ID: 2243556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tales from the baby factory. Hopkins E N Y Times Mag; 1992 Mar; ():40-41, 78, 80+. PubMed ID: 11646107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pregnancies following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer and following gamete intrafallopian transfer. Zhang LZ; Liu B; Li MZ; Wang XY; Yuan H; Jia JW; Liu P; Zhao WX; Li Y Chin Med J (Engl); 1988 May; 101(5):303-4. PubMed ID: 3145827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Financing high-tech reproductive medical expenditures. Mueller MW Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995; 6(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 12645603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Elements to be considered in obtaining informed consent for ART. ; Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5 Suppl 1):S272-3. PubMed ID: 17055840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Gamete intrafallopian transfer and related procedures. Corson SL Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Oct; 1(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2491111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Parental imprinting related to Assisted Reproductive Technologies]. Fauque P; Jouannet P; Jammes H Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Nov; 36(11):1139-46. PubMed ID: 18922729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection. Shih W; Rushford DD; Bourne H; Garrett C; McBain JC; Healy DL; Baker HW Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1644-53. PubMed ID: 18442997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transplantation of gametes and embryos: an outgrowth of assisted reproductive technologies. Bates GW; Boone WR J S C Med Assoc; 1991 Jun; 87(6):335. PubMed ID: 1861467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Results from the advanced reproductive technologies: fresh vs. frozen? Sills ES; Walsh DJ; Walsh AP Ir Med J; 2008 Oct; 101(9):288; author reply 289. PubMed ID: 19051622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The baby myth. Begley S; Brant M; Springen K; Rogers A Newsweek; 1995 Sep; 126(10):38-47. PubMed ID: 11653218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]