128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17216581)
1. Biological response of new activated acrylic bone cements with antiseptic properties. Histomorphometric analysis.
de la Torre B; Salvado M; Corchón MA; Vázquez B; Collía F; De Pedro JA; San Román J
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 May; 18(5):933-41. PubMed ID: 17216581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biocompatibility and other properties of acrylic bone cements prepared with antiseptic activators.
de la Torre B; Fernández M; Vázquez B; Collía F; de Pedro JA; López-Bravo A; San Román J
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2003 Aug; 66(2):502-13. PubMed ID: 12861600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Injectable and self-curing composites of acrylic/bioactive glass and drug systems. A histomorphometric analysis of the behaviour in rabbits.
González Corchón MA; Salvado M; de la Torre BJ; Collía F; de Pedro JA; Vázquez B; Román JS
Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(9):1778-87. PubMed ID: 16260032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel Osteogenic Behaviors around Hydrophilic and Radical-Free 4-META/MMA-TBB: Implications of an Osseointegrating Bone Cement.
Sugita Y; Okubo T; Saita M; Ishijima M; Torii Y; Tanaka M; Iwasaki C; Sekiya T; Tabuchi M; Mohammadzadeh Rezaei N; Taniyama T; Sato N; Saruta J; Hasegawa M; Hirota M; Park W; Lee MC; Maeda H; Ogawa T
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Mar; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 32244335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chlorhexidine release and antibacterial properties of chlorhexidine-incorporated polymethyl methacrylate-based resin cement.
Hiraishi N; Yiu CK; King NM; Tay FR
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2010 Jul; 94(1):134-40. PubMed ID: 20524187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo response to a low-modulus PMMA bone cement in an ovine model.
Robo C; Hulsart-Billström G; Nilsson M; Persson C
Acta Biomater; 2018 May; 72():362-370. PubMed ID: 29559365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short- and long-term effects of vertebroplastic bone cement on cancellous bone.
Quan R; Ni Y; Zhang L; Xu J; Zheng X; Yang D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():102-10. PubMed ID: 24762857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of Nano-HA Coated Bone Collagen to Acrylic (Polymethylmethacrylate) Bone Cement on Mechanical Properties and Bioactivity.
Li T; Weng X; Bian Y; Zhou L; Cui F; Qiu Z
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129018. PubMed ID: 26039750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interfacial tensile strength between polymethylmethacrylate-based bioactive bone cements and bone.
Kamimura M; Tamura J; Shinzato S; Kawanabe K; Neo M; Kokubo T; Nakamura T
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002 Sep; 61(4):564-71. PubMed ID: 12115446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioactive polymethyl methacrylate-based bone cement: comparison of glass beads, apatite- and wollastonite-containing glass-ceramic, and hydroxyapatite fillers on mechanical and biological properties.
Shinzato S; Kobayashi M; Mousa WF; Kamimura M; Neo M; Kitamura Y; Kokubo T; Nakamura T
J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Aug; 51(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 10825226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone bonding ability and handling properties of a titania-polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) composite bioactive bone cement modified with a unique PMMA powder.
Fukuda C; Goto K; Imamura M; Neo M; Nakamura T
Acta Biomater; 2011 Oct; 7(10):3595-600. PubMed ID: 21704200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of oligo(trimethylene carbonate) addition on the stiffness of acrylic bone cement.
Persson C; López A; Fathali H; Hoess A; Rojas R; Ott MK; Hilborn J; Engqvist H
Biomatter; 2016; 6(1):e1133394. PubMed ID: 26727581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The osteolytic response of macrophages to challenge with particles of Simplex P, Endurance, Palacos R, and Vertebroplastic bone cement particles in vitro.
Ingram JH; Kowalski R; Fisher J; Ingham E
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Oct; 75(1):210-20. PubMed ID: 16032651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The biocompatibility of porous vs non-porous bone cements: a new methodological approach.
Dall'Oca C; Maluta T; Cavani F; Morbioli GP; Bernardi P; Sbarbati A; Degl'Innocenti D; Magnan B
Eur J Histochem; 2014 Jun; 58(2):2255. PubMed ID: 24998920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biocompatibility and bone formation with porous modified PMMA in normal and irradiated mandibular tissue.
Lye KW; Tideman H; Wolke JC; Merkx MA; Chin FK; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():100-9. PubMed ID: 22150934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [In vitro studies on various PMMA bone cements: a first comparison of new materials for arthroplasty].
Kock HJ; Huber FX; Hillmeier J; Jäger R; Volkmann R; Handschin AE; Letsch R; Meeder PJ
Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 18324591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrograde root filling using antibiotic-containing, radiopaque, bone cement.
High AS; Russell JL
J Dent; 1989 Oct; 17(5):241-5. PubMed ID: 2621275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical, material, and antimicrobial properties of acrylic bone cement impregnated with silver nanoparticles.
Slane J; Vivanco J; Rose W; Ploeg HL; Squire M
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2015 Mar; 48():188-96. PubMed ID: 25579913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the shrinkage of commercial bone cements when mixed under vacuum.
Kwong FN; Power RA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):120-2. PubMed ID: 16365134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone Response to Porous Poly(methyl methacrylate) Cement Loaded with Hydroxyapatite Particles in a Rabbit Mandibular Model.
Sa Y; Yu N; Wolke JGC; Chanchareonsook N; Goh BT; Wang Y; Yang F; Jansen JA
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2017 May; 23(5):262-273. PubMed ID: 28372521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
