202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17216655)
21. 3D finite element model of biofilm detachment using real biofilm structures from CLSM data.
Böl M; Möhle RB; Haesner M; Neu TR; Horn H; Krull R
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2009 May; 103(1):177-86. PubMed ID: 19191328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Applying the digital image correlation method to estimate the mechanical properties of bacterial biofilms subjected to a wall shear stress.
Mathias JD; Stoodley P
Biofouling; 2009 Nov; 25(8):695-703. PubMed ID: 20183128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Internal and external mass transfer in biofilms grown at various flow velocities.
Beyenal H; Lewandowski Z
Biotechnol Prog; 2002; 18(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 11822900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Longtime behavior of one-dimensional biofilm models with shear dependent detachment rates.
Abbas F; Sudarsan R; Eberl HJ
Math Biosci Eng; 2012 Apr; 9(2):215-39. PubMed ID: 22901062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Online assessment of biofilm development, sloughing and forced detachment in tube reactor by means of magnetic resonance microscopy.
Wagner M; Manz B; Volke F; Neu TR; Horn H
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Sep; 107(1):172-81. PubMed ID: 20506514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Role of shear stress on composition, diversity and dynamics of biofilm bacterial communities.
Rochex A; Godon JJ; Bernet N; Escudié R
Water Res; 2008 Dec; 42(20):4915-22. PubMed ID: 18945468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Microfluidic devices for studying growth and detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.
Lee JH; Kaplan JB; Lee WY
Biomed Microdevices; 2008 Aug; 10(4):489-98. PubMed ID: 18204904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of flow regime on pressure drop increase and biomass accumulation and morphology in membrane systems.
Vrouwenvelder JS; Buiter J; Riviere M; van der Meer WG; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC
Water Res; 2010 Feb; 44(3):689-702. PubMed ID: 19836048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Microbiology, chemistry and biofilm development in a pilot drinking water distribution system with copper and plastic pipes.
Lehtola MJ; Miettinen IT; Keinänen MM; Kekki TK; Laine O; Hirvonen A; Vartiainen T; Martikainen PJ
Water Res; 2004 Oct; 38(17):3769-79. PubMed ID: 15350429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Structure and shear strength of microbial biofilms as determined with confocal laser scanning microscopy and fluid dynamic gauging using a novel rotating disc biofilm reactor.
Möhle RB; Langemann T; Haesner M; Augustin W; Scholl S; Neu TR; Hempel DC; Horn H
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Nov; 98(4):747-55. PubMed ID: 17421046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A simple system for biofilm potential monitoring in drinking water.
Delahaye E; Levi Y; Leblon G; Montiel A
J Basic Microbiol; 2006; 46(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 16463314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Analysis of fluid flow and wall shear stress patterns inside partially filled agitated culture well plates.
Salek MM; Sattari P; Martinuzzi RJ
Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Mar; 40(3):707-28. PubMed ID: 22042624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk assessment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in water.
Mena KD; Gerba CP
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 201():71-115. PubMed ID: 19484589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Utilisation of a packed-bed biofilm reactor for the determination of the potential of biofilm accumulation in water systems.
Morato J; Codony F; Mas J
Biofouling; 2005; 21(3-4):151-60. PubMed ID: 16371335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Towards optimum permeability reduction in porous media using biofilm growth simulations.
Pintelon TR; Graf von der Schulenburg DA; Johns ML
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2009 Jul; 103(4):767-79. PubMed ID: 19309753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Drinking water biofilm assessment of total and culturable bacteria under different operating conditions.
Simões LC; Azevedo N; Pacheco A; Keevil CW; Vieira MJ
Biofouling; 2006; 22(1-2):91-9. PubMed ID: 16581673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Drinking water biofilm cohesiveness changes under chlorination or hydrodynamic stress.
Mathieu L; Bertrand I; Abe Y; Angel E; Block JC; Skali-Lami S; Francius G
Water Res; 2014 May; 55():175-84. PubMed ID: 24607313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Measuring local flow velocities and biofilm structure in biofilm systems with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Manz B; Volke F; Goll D; Horn H
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Nov; 84(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 14574699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biofilm responses to ageing and to a high phosphate load in a bench-scale drinking water system.
Batté M; Koudjonou B; Laurent P; Mathieu L; Coallier J; Prévost M
Water Res; 2003 Mar; 37(6):1351-61. PubMed ID: 12598197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of shear on microbial adhesion to PEO-brushes and glass by convective-diffusion and sedimentation in a parallel plate flow chamber.
Roosjen A; Boks NP; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ; Norde W
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2005 Nov; 46(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 16198548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
