These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17217547)

  • 1. UK waiting time targets in lung cancer treatment: are they achievable? Results of a prospective tracking study.
    Devbhandari MP; Soon SY; Quennell P; Barber P; Krysiak P; Shah R; Jones MT
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Jan; 2():5. PubMed ID: 17217547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are we achieving the current waiting time targets in lung cancer treatment? Result of a prospective study from a large United kingdom teaching hospital.
    Devbhandari MP; Bittar MN; Quennell P; Barber P; Krysiak P; Shah R; Jones MT
    J Thorac Oncol; 2007 Jul; 2(7):590-2. PubMed ID: 17607113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of a negative bronchoscopy on waiting times to treatment for lung cancer patients: results of a prospective tracking study.
    Devbhandari MP; Quennell P; Krysiak P; Shah R; Jones MT
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Sep; 34(3):479-83. PubMed ID: 18667329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cutting cancer waiting times: streamlining cervical lymph node biopsy.
    Dimbleby G; Golding L; Al Hamarneh O; Ahmad I
    J Laryngol Otol; 2013 Oct; 127(10):1007-11. PubMed ID: 24074011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Referral patterns, cancer diagnoses, and waiting times after introduction of two week wait rule for breast cancer: prospective cohort study.
    Potter S; Govindarajulu S; Shere M; Braddon F; Curran G; Greenwood R; Sahu AK; Cawthorn SJ
    BMJ; 2007 Aug; 335(7614):288. PubMed ID: 17631514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrospective analysis on timeframes of referral, diagnosis and treatment of patients with endometrial carcinomas in Dunedin Hospital, 2008-2011.
    Kang MY; Sykes P; Herbison PY; Petrich S
    N Z Med J; 2013 Oct; 126(1384):84-95. PubMed ID: 24162633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical presentation and waiting time targets do not affect prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer.
    Raptis DA; Fessas C; Belasyse-Smith P; Kurzawinski TR
    Surgeon; 2010 Oct; 8(5):239-46. PubMed ID: 20709279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of the '2 week wait' directive for suspected cancer on service provision in a symptomatic breast clinic.
    Cant PJ; Yu DS
    Br J Surg; 2000 Aug; 87(8):1082-6. PubMed ID: 10931055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Under utilisation of the 2-week wait initiative for lung cancer by primary care and its effect on the urgent referral pathway.
    Lewis NR; Le Jeune I; Baldwin DR
    Br J Cancer; 2005 Oct; 93(8):905-8. PubMed ID: 16189521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Waiting times for cancer care in four most frequent cancers in several French regions in 2011 and 2012].
    Pourcel G; Ledesert B; Bousquet PJ; Ferrari C; Viguier J; Buzyn A
    Bull Cancer; 2013 Dec; 100(12):1237-50. PubMed ID: 24158562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study on the routes of referral for patients with colorectal cancer and its affect on the time to surgery and pathological stage.
    Trickett JP; Donaldson DR; Bearn PE; Scott HJ; Hassall AC
    Colorectal Dis; 2004 Nov; 6(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 15521930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The "two-week wait" referral pathway allows prompt treatment but does not improve outcome for patients with oesophago-gastric cancer.
    Sharpe D; Williams RN; Ubhi SS; Sutton CD; Bowrey DJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 36(10):977-81. PubMed ID: 20702059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audit of acute referrals to the Department of Dermatology at Waikato Hospital: comparison with national access criteria for first specialist appointment.
    Stanway A; Oakley A; Rademaker M; Duffill M
    N Z Med J; 2004 Apr; 117(1192):U849. PubMed ID: 15107871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-week rule: has prioritisation of breast referrals by general practitioners improved?
    Imkampe A; Bendall S; Chianakwalam C
    Breast; 2006 Oct; 15(5):654-8. PubMed ID: 16580206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colorectal cancer--a prospective evaluation of symptom duration and GP referral patterns in an inner city teaching hospital.
    Khattak I; Eardley NJ; Rooney PS
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Jul; 8(6):518-21. PubMed ID: 16784474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The novel use of fast track CT to select patients for lung cancer clinics: effect on clinic efficiency, waiting times, and patient satisfaction.
    Lal A; Phillips S; Russell C; Woolhouse I
    Postgrad Med J; 2011 Apr; 87(1026):264-8. PubMed ID: 21273361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of triage on waiting time for community rehabilitation: a prospective cohort study.
    Harding KE; Taylor NF; Leggat SG; Stafford M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Mar; 93(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 22244686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Delays in the referral and treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
    Hollows P; McAndrew PG; Perini MG
    Br Dent J; 2000 Mar; 188(5):262-5. PubMed ID: 10758688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Head and neck cancer waiting times.
    Webb CJ; Benton J; Tandon S; Jones TM; Roland NJ
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 32(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 17651275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel rapid access testicular cancer clinic: prospective evaluation after one year.
    Carey K; Davis NF; Elamin S; Ahern P; Brady CM; Sweeney P
    Ir J Med Sci; 2016 Feb; 185(1):215-8. PubMed ID: 25772124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.