202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17217547)
1. UK waiting time targets in lung cancer treatment: are they achievable? Results of a prospective tracking study.
Devbhandari MP; Soon SY; Quennell P; Barber P; Krysiak P; Shah R; Jones MT
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Jan; 2():5. PubMed ID: 17217547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are we achieving the current waiting time targets in lung cancer treatment? Result of a prospective study from a large United kingdom teaching hospital.
Devbhandari MP; Bittar MN; Quennell P; Barber P; Krysiak P; Shah R; Jones MT
J Thorac Oncol; 2007 Jul; 2(7):590-2. PubMed ID: 17607113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implications of a negative bronchoscopy on waiting times to treatment for lung cancer patients: results of a prospective tracking study.
Devbhandari MP; Quennell P; Krysiak P; Shah R; Jones MT
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Sep; 34(3):479-83. PubMed ID: 18667329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cutting cancer waiting times: streamlining cervical lymph node biopsy.
Dimbleby G; Golding L; Al Hamarneh O; Ahmad I
J Laryngol Otol; 2013 Oct; 127(10):1007-11. PubMed ID: 24074011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Referral patterns, cancer diagnoses, and waiting times after introduction of two week wait rule for breast cancer: prospective cohort study.
Potter S; Govindarajulu S; Shere M; Braddon F; Curran G; Greenwood R; Sahu AK; Cawthorn SJ
BMJ; 2007 Aug; 335(7614):288. PubMed ID: 17631514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrospective analysis on timeframes of referral, diagnosis and treatment of patients with endometrial carcinomas in Dunedin Hospital, 2008-2011.
Kang MY; Sykes P; Herbison PY; Petrich S
N Z Med J; 2013 Oct; 126(1384):84-95. PubMed ID: 24162633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical presentation and waiting time targets do not affect prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Raptis DA; Fessas C; Belasyse-Smith P; Kurzawinski TR
Surgeon; 2010 Oct; 8(5):239-46. PubMed ID: 20709279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the '2 week wait' directive for suspected cancer on service provision in a symptomatic breast clinic.
Cant PJ; Yu DS
Br J Surg; 2000 Aug; 87(8):1082-6. PubMed ID: 10931055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Under utilisation of the 2-week wait initiative for lung cancer by primary care and its effect on the urgent referral pathway.
Lewis NR; Le Jeune I; Baldwin DR
Br J Cancer; 2005 Oct; 93(8):905-8. PubMed ID: 16189521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Waiting times for cancer care in four most frequent cancers in several French regions in 2011 and 2012].
Pourcel G; Ledesert B; Bousquet PJ; Ferrari C; Viguier J; Buzyn A
Bull Cancer; 2013 Dec; 100(12):1237-50. PubMed ID: 24158562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A study on the routes of referral for patients with colorectal cancer and its affect on the time to surgery and pathological stage.
Trickett JP; Donaldson DR; Bearn PE; Scott HJ; Hassall AC
Colorectal Dis; 2004 Nov; 6(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 15521930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The "two-week wait" referral pathway allows prompt treatment but does not improve outcome for patients with oesophago-gastric cancer.
Sharpe D; Williams RN; Ubhi SS; Sutton CD; Bowrey DJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 36(10):977-81. PubMed ID: 20702059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audit of acute referrals to the Department of Dermatology at Waikato Hospital: comparison with national access criteria for first specialist appointment.
Stanway A; Oakley A; Rademaker M; Duffill M
N Z Med J; 2004 Apr; 117(1192):U849. PubMed ID: 15107871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-week rule: has prioritisation of breast referrals by general practitioners improved?
Imkampe A; Bendall S; Chianakwalam C
Breast; 2006 Oct; 15(5):654-8. PubMed ID: 16580206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colorectal cancer--a prospective evaluation of symptom duration and GP referral patterns in an inner city teaching hospital.
Khattak I; Eardley NJ; Rooney PS
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Jul; 8(6):518-21. PubMed ID: 16784474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The novel use of fast track CT to select patients for lung cancer clinics: effect on clinic efficiency, waiting times, and patient satisfaction.
Lal A; Phillips S; Russell C; Woolhouse I
Postgrad Med J; 2011 Apr; 87(1026):264-8. PubMed ID: 21273361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of triage on waiting time for community rehabilitation: a prospective cohort study.
Harding KE; Taylor NF; Leggat SG; Stafford M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Mar; 93(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 22244686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delays in the referral and treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Hollows P; McAndrew PG; Perini MG
Br Dent J; 2000 Mar; 188(5):262-5. PubMed ID: 10758688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Head and neck cancer waiting times.
Webb CJ; Benton J; Tandon S; Jones TM; Roland NJ
Clin Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 32(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 17651275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel rapid access testicular cancer clinic: prospective evaluation after one year.
Carey K; Davis NF; Elamin S; Ahern P; Brady CM; Sweeney P
Ir J Med Sci; 2016 Feb; 185(1):215-8. PubMed ID: 25772124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
