121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17217605)
1. Marriage and cancer prevention: does marital status and inviting both spouses together influence colorectal cancer screening participation?
van Jaarsveld CH; Miles A; Edwards R; Wardle J
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(4):172-6. PubMed ID: 17217605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.
Van Roosbroeck S; Hoeck S; Van Hal G
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 22560885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing different strategies for colorectal cancer screening in Italy: predictors of patients' participation.
Senore C; Armaroli P; Silvani M; Andreoni B; Bisanti L; Marai L; Castiglione G; Grazzini G; Taddei S; Gasperoni S; Giuliani O; Malfitana G; Marutti A; Genta G; Segnan N
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jan; 105(1):188-98. PubMed ID: 19826409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association of marital status and colorectal cancer screening participation in the USA.
El-Haddad B; Dong F; Kallail KJ; Hines RB; Ablah E
Colorectal Dis; 2015 May; 17(5):O108-14. PubMed ID: 25704636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determinants of non-participation in a mass screening program for colorectal cancer in Finland.
Artama M; Heinävaara S; Sarkeala T; Prättälä R; Pukkala E; Malila N
Acta Oncol; 2016 Jul; 55(7):870-4. PubMed ID: 27152755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences between husbands and wives in colonoscopy use: Results from a national sample of married couples.
Kotwal AA; Lauderdale DS; Waite LJ; Dale W
Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():46-52. PubMed ID: 27009632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of marital status and partner concordance on participation in colorectal cancer screening.
Gram MA; Therkildsen C; Clarke RB; Andersen KK; Mørch LS; Tybjerg AJ
Eur J Public Health; 2021 Apr; 31(2):340-346. PubMed ID: 33417705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward understanding nonparticipation in sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.
Blom J; Yin L; Lidén A; Dolk A; Jeppsson B; Påhlman L; Holmberg L; Nyrén O
Int J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 122(7):1618-23. PubMed ID: 18064580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of a Doctor's Invitation on Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Trial.
Barthe J; Perrodeau E; Gilberg S; Ravaud P; Ghasarossian C; Marchand-Buttin F; Deyra J; Falcoff H
Am J Med; 2015 Sep; 128(9):1024.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25908395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of marital status on the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.
Hanske J; Meyer CP; Sammon JD; Choueiri TK; Menon M; Lipsitz SR; Noldus J; Nguyen PL; Sun M; Trinh QD
Prev Med; 2016 Aug; 89():140-145. PubMed ID: 27215758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flexible sigmoidoscopy in the PLCO cancer screening trial: results from the baseline screening examination of a randomized trial.
Weissfeld JL; Schoen RE; Pinsky PF; Bresalier RS; Church T; Yurgalevitch S; Austin JH; Prorok PC; Gohagan JK;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jul; 97(13):989-97. PubMed ID: 15998952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of sigmoidoscopic screening for colorectal cancer in the Hunter Region.
Agrez MV; Redman S; Sanson-Fisher R; Hennrikus D
Aust N Z J Surg; 1990 Feb; 60(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 2327918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cancer fear: facilitator and deterrent to participation in colorectal cancer screening.
Vrinten C; Waller J; von Wagner C; Wardle J
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Feb; 24(2):400-5. PubMed ID: 25634890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An advance notification letter increases participation in colorectal cancer screening.
Cole SR; Smith A; Wilson C; Turnbull D; Esterman A; Young GP
J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):73-5. PubMed ID: 17626705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Hol L; van Leerdam ME; van Ballegooijen M; van Vuuren AJ; van Dekken H; Reijerink JC; van der Togt AC; Habbema JD; Kuipers EJ
Gut; 2010 Jan; 59(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19671542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of reminders for colorectal cancer screening: participation and inequality.
Deding U; Henig AS; Torp-Pedersen C; Bøggild H
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Jan; 34(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 30386888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of marriage and separation on the psychotropic medication use of non-married cohabiters: a register-based longitudinal study among adult Finns.
Metsä-Simola N; Martikainen P
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Nov; 121():10-20. PubMed ID: 25306405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sociodemographic predictors of participation in colorectal cancer screening.
Deding U; Henig AS; Salling A; Torp-Pedersen C; Bøggild H
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1117-1124. PubMed ID: 28501944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marital status, partner satisfaction, and depressive symptoms in older men and women.
St John PD; Montgomery PR
Can J Psychiatry; 2009 Jul; 54(7):487-92. PubMed ID: 19660171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates.
Segnan N; Senore C; Andreoni B; Arrigoni A; Bisanti L; Cardelli A; Castiglione G; Crosta C; DiPlacido R; Ferrari A; Ferraris R; Ferrero F; Fracchia M; Gasperoni S; Malfitana G; Recchia S; Risio M; Rizzetto M; Saracco G; Spandre M; Turco D; Turco P; Zappa M;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 15741571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
