121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17217605)
21. Cancer screening among Latino subgroups in the United States.
Gorin SS; Heck JE
Prev Med; 2005 May; 40(5):515-26. PubMed ID: 15749133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality of life and trial adherence among participants in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.
Taylor KL; Shelby R; Gelmann E; McGuire C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Jul; 96(14):1083-94. PubMed ID: 15265970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A quasi-randomized trial on the effectiveness of an invitation letter to improve participation in a setting of opportunistic screening for cervical cancer.
de Jonge E; Cloes E; Op de Beeck L; Adriaens B; Lousbergh D; Orye GG; Buntinx F
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Jun; 17(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 18414195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Offering people a choice for colorectal cancer screening.
Senore C; Ederle A; Benazzato L; Arrigoni A; Silvani M; Fantin A; Fracchia M; Armaroli P; Segnan N
Gut; 2013 May; 62(5):735-40. PubMed ID: 22442162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Screening for Bowel Cancer: Increasing Participation via Personal Invitation.
Hoffmeister M; Holleczek B; Zwink N; Stock C; Stegmaier C; Brenner H
Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2017 Feb; 114(6):87-93. PubMed ID: 28266301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years with a high or low risk of breast cancer: socioeconomic status, parity, and age at birth of first child.
Hellquist BN; Czene K; Hjälm A; Nyström L; Jonsson H
Cancer; 2015 Jan; 121(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 25242087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The intersection of sex, marital status, and cardiovascular risk factors in shaping stroke incidence: results from the health and retirement study.
Maselko J; Bates LM; Avendaño M; Glymour MM
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2009 Dec; 57(12):2293-9. PubMed ID: 19874408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?
van Dam L; Korfage IJ; Kuipers EJ; Hol L; van Roon AH; Reijerink JC; van Ballegooijen M; van Leerdam ME
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Jul; 49(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 23571149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Marital status and colon cancer outcomes in US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries: does marriage affect cancer survival by gender and stage?
Wang L; Wilson SE; Stewart DB; Hollenbeak CS
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 35(5):417-22. PubMed ID: 21466984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The impact of marriage on bladder cancer mortality.
Nelles JL; Joseph SA; Konety BR
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 18625568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sexual experiences of married HIV positive women in Osogbo, southwest Nigeria: role of inappropriate status disclosure.
Adekanle DA; Olowookere SA; Adewole AD; Adeleke NA; Abioye-Kuteyi EA; Ijadunola MY
BMC Womens Health; 2015; 15():6. PubMed ID: 25783638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ethnic differences in participation in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in the UK.
Robb KA; Power E; Atkin W; Wardle J
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 18927095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of divorce and widowhood on fertility in Egypt.
El-guindy M
Egypt Popul Fam Plann Rev; 1979; 13(1-2):84-94. PubMed ID: 12312265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reinvitation to screening colonoscopy: a randomized-controlled trial of reminding letter and invitation to educational meeting on attendance in nonresponders to initial invitation to screening colonoscopy (REINVITE).
Pisera M; Kaminski MF; Kraszewska E; Rupinski M; Regula J
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 May; 28(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 26967693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Marital status, marital strain, and risk of coronary heart disease or total mortality: the Framingham Offspring Study.
Eaker ED; Sullivan LM; Kelly-Hayes M; D'Agostino RB; Benjamin EJ
Psychosom Med; 2007; 69(6):509-13. PubMed ID: 17634565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Uptake of faecal immunochemical test screening among nonparticipants in a flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme.
Hol L; Kuipers EJ; van Ballegooijen M; van Vuuren AJ; Reijerink JC; Habbema DJ; van Leerdam ME
Int J Cancer; 2012 May; 130(9):2096-102. PubMed ID: 21702046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Marital status: a gender-independent risk factor for poorer survival after radical cystectomy.
Sammon JD; Morgan M; Djahangirian O; Trinh QD; Sun M; Ghani KR; Jeong W; Jhaveri J; Ehlert M; Schmitges J; Bianchi M; Shariat SF; Perrotte P; Rogers CG; Peabody JO; Menon M; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2012 Nov; 110(9):1301-9. PubMed ID: 22449122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Body mass index and up-to-date colorectal cancer screening among Marylanders aged 50 years and older.
Menis M; Kozlovsky B; Langenberg P; Zhan M; Dwyer DM; Israel E; Groves C; Hopkins A; Steinberger EK
Prev Chronic Dis; 2006 Jul; 3(3):A88. PubMed ID: 16776889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Colorectal cancer screening with the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing: a French population-based controlled study (Wintzenheim trial).
Denis B; Gendre I; Aman F; Ribstein F; Maurin P; Perrin P
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 45(18):3282-90. PubMed ID: 19665368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
