These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17217778)

  • 1. [Study on crossed and uncrossed disparity evoked potential of dynamic random dot stereogram].
    Liu H; Yan M; Zeng LF; Hou C; Liu LQ
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 42(10):878-82. PubMed ID: 17217778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [An event-related potential study the on information processing of binocular disparity in random-dot stereogram].
    Shen MW; Wang R; Tang XW; Zhu HY
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2004 Apr; 17(2):149-51. PubMed ID: 15920836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical study on crossed disparity and uncrossed disparity in intermittent exotropia before and after surgery].
    Lin N; Lu W; Wang JH
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 42(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 16643729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A clinical observation on variation of crossed disparity and uncrossed disparity in intermittent exotropia].
    Lu W; Wang J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 38(8):462-5. PubMed ID: 12410982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The detection of disparity evoked potentials in anisometropes].
    Hou C; Zeng L; Yan M; Fang Q; Shou T
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jul; 36(4):278-81. PubMed ID: 11853614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of disparity change on binocular visual evoked potential parameters elicited by convergent dynamic random-dot stereogram stimuli in humans.
    Sahinoğlu B
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Nov; 88(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 12436288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study of relationship between multifocal VEF responses and binocular disparity.
    Owaki T; Takeda T
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():107. PubMed ID: 16012697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Stereoscopic visual evoked potential elicited by static random dot stereogram].
    Hu C; Yang DS; Li X
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Jul; 30(4):286-8. PubMed ID: 7843021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occlusion contributes to temporal processing differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis in random-dot displays.
    Becker S; Bowd C; Shorter S; King K; Patterson R
    Vision Res; 1999 Jan; 39(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 10326139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ocular prevalence: difference between crossed and uncrossed disparities of stereo objects.
    Jaschinski W; Schroth V
    Strabismus; 2008; 16(4):159-64. PubMed ID: 19089761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stereoscopic depth perception in peripheral field and global processing of horizontal disparity gradient pattern.
    Devisme C; Drobe B; Monot A; Droulez J
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(6):753-64. PubMed ID: 18249435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Test Distance on Stereoacuity in Intermittent Exotropia.
    Seki Y; Wakayama A; Takahashi R; Umebara I; Tanabe F; Abe K; Shimomura Y
    Strabismus; 2017 Mar; 25(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 28156199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shape discrimination for rectangles defined by disparity alone, by disparity plus luminance and by disparity plus motion.
    Regan D; Hamstra SJ
    Vision Res; 1994 Sep; 34(17):2277-91. PubMed ID: 7941421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the typical development of stereopsis: fine and coarse processing.
    Giaschi D; Narasimhan S; Solski A; Harrison E; Wilcox LM
    Vision Res; 2013 Aug; 89():65-71. PubMed ID: 23891704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in stereoacuity between crossed and uncrossed disparities reduce with practice.
    Clayton R; Siderov J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Nov; 42(6):1353-1362. PubMed ID: 35997266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Depth-related visually evoked potentials by dynamic random-dot stereograms in humans: negative correlation between the peaks elicited by convergent and divergent disparities.
    Sahinoğlu B
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2004 May; 91(5-6):689-97. PubMed ID: 14704799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stereoscopic processing of crossed and uncrossed disparities in the human visual cortex.
    Li Y; Zhang C; Hou C; Yao L; Zhang J; Long Z
    BMC Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 18(1):80. PubMed ID: 29268696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stereopsis and aging.
    Norman JF; Norman HF; Craft AE; Walton CL; Bartholomew AN; Burton CL; Wiesemann EY; Crabtree CE
    Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(23-24):2456-65. PubMed ID: 18771680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stereoscopic evoked responses to crossed and uncrossed disparity accompanying simulated refractive error.
    Neill RA; Dunlop P; Dunlop DB; Fenelon B; Dunlop C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1988 Oct; 72(10):759-63. PubMed ID: 3191078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.