204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17218209)
1. A 10-year comparison of explanted Hancock-II and Carpentier-Edwards supraannular bioprostheses.
Butany J; Leong SW; Cunningham KS; D'Cruz G; Carmichael K; Yau TM
Cardiovasc Pathol; 2007; 16(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 17218209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
Jamieson WR; David TE; Feindel CM; Miyagishima RT; Germann E
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 12056738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
Jamieson WR; Gudas VM; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Fradet GJ; Ling H; Germann E; Lichtenstein SV
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An assessment of the mechanical properties of leaflets from four second-generation porcine bioprostheses with biaxial testing techniques.
Mayne AS; Christie GW; Smaill BH; Hunter PJ; Barratt-Boyes BG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Aug; 98(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 2755150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Comparison of standard and supra-annular prostheses at 7 years.
Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Miyagishima RT; Germann E; Janusz MT; Ling H
Circulation; 1991 Nov; 84(5 Suppl):III145-52. PubMed ID: 1934404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses.
Eric Jamieson WR; Marchand MA; Pelletier CL; Norton R; Pellerin M; Dubiel TW; Aupart MR; Daenen WJ; Holden MP; David TE; Ryba EA; Anderson WN
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 118(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 10425003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Carpentier-Edwards standard and supra-annular porcine bioprostheses: 10 year comparison of structural valve deterioration.
Jamieson WR; Burr LH; Tyers GF; Munro AI
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 8162218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Commissural dehiscence: a rare and peculiar cause of porcine valve structural deterioration.
Bottio T; Valente M; Rizzoli G; Tarzia V; Bisleri G; Pettenazzo E; Gerosa G; Thiene G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Nov; 132(5):1017-22. PubMed ID: 17059917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Carpentier-Edwards standard and supraannular porcine bioprostheses: comparison of technology.
Jamieson WR; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Munro AI; Hayden RI; Miyagishima RT; Ling H; Fradet GJ; Lichtenstein SV; Stewart KM
Ann Thorac Surg; 1999 Jan; 67(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 10086520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial of carpentier-edwards supraannular prosthesis versus mosaic aortic prosthesis: 6 year results.
Birla R; Twine G; Unsworth-White J
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Mar; 95(3):831-7. PubMed ID: 23201103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biaxial strain distributions in explanted porcine bioprosthetic valves.
Adamczyk MM; Vesely I
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):688-95. PubMed ID: 12358406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective randomized comparison of Medtronic Mosaic and Carpentier-Edwards-SAV in the aortic position: an interim report.
John A; Khan Z; Kuo J; Allen SM; Marchbank AJ; Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Lewis CT; Twine G; Edwards M; Unsworth-White J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 May; 15(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 16784086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inflammation and infection in nine surgically explanted Medtronic Freestyle stentless aortic valves.
Butany J; Zhou T; Leong SW; Cunningham KS; Thangaroopan M; Jegatheeswaran A; Feindel C; David TE
Cardiovasc Pathol; 2007; 16(5):258-67. PubMed ID: 17868876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Correlation between malfunction of a bioprosthesis and deformation of a valve stent. Comparison of three different vale models].
Actis Dato GM; Caimmi P; Di Rosa E; Deorsola L; Aidala E; Punta G; Poletti G; Di Summa M
Minerva Cardioangiol; 1998 Apr; 46(4):97-101. PubMed ID: 9835735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: a matched hemodynamic comparison.
Borger MA; Nette AF; Maganti M; Feindel CM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Jun; 83(6):2054-8. PubMed ID: 17532395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve: use of microsimulation.
Puvimanasinghe JP; Takkenberg JJ; Eijkemans MJ; Steyerberg EW; van Herwerden LA; Grunkemeier GL; Habbema JD; Bogers AJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Sep; 80(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 16122436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
Puvimanasinghe JP; Takkenberg JJ; Eijkemans MJ; van Herwerden LA; Jamieson WR; Grunkemeier GL; Habbema JD; Bogers AJ
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Mar; 29(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 16386920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphological findings in explanted Toronto stentless porcine valves.
Butany J; Collins MJ; Nair V; Leask RL; Scully HE; Williams WG; David TE
Cardiovasc Pathol; 2006; 15(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 16414456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
