These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17219125)
1. The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test-variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis. Bach M Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 245(7):965-71. PubMed ID: 17219125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Freiburg Acuity Test in Preschool Children: Testability, Test-Retest Variability, and Comparison With LEA Symbols. Farassat N; Jehle V; Heinrich SP; Lagrèze WA; Bach M Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Mar; 13(3):14. PubMed ID: 38502142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual Acuity Testing: Feedback Affects Neither Outcome nor Reproducibility, but Leaves Participants Happier. Bach M; Schäfer K PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147803. PubMed ID: 26824693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual acuities "hand motion" and "counting fingers" can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test. Schulze-Bonsel K; Feltgen N; Burau H; Hansen L; Bach M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1236-40. PubMed ID: 16505064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resolving the clinical acuity categories "hand motion" and "counting fingers" using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT). Lange C; Feltgen N; Junker B; Schulze-Bonsel K; Bach M Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 247(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 18766368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of two visual acuity tests in school enrolment examinations : Tumbling E test versus Freiburg visual acuity test]. Bach M; Reuter M; Lagrèze WA Ophthalmologe; 2016 Aug; 113(8):684-9. PubMed ID: 27048550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. Bach M Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jan; 73(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8867682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of three different visual acuity testing procedures in school children. Schmidt-Bacher A; Pritsch M; Kolling G Strabismus; 2007; 15(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 17523045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of optotype presentation duration on acuity estimates revisited. Heinrich SP; Krüger K; Bach M Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 248(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 20076965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [DIN-compatible vision assessment of increased reproducibility using staircase measurement and maximum likelihood analysis]. Weigmann U; Petersen J Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 8963126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart]. Wesemann W Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Sep; 219(9):660-7. PubMed ID: 12410466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol. Beck RW; Moke PS; Turpin AH; Ferris FL; SanGiovanni JP; Johnson CA; Birch EE; Chandler DL; Cox TA; Blair RC; Kraker RT Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 12566024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. Simpson TL; Regan D Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 72(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7731649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing. Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M; Kunawut C; Masayaanon P Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):662-9. PubMed ID: 14516806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]