These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17219125)

  • 1. The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test-variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis.
    Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 245(7):965-71. PubMed ID: 17219125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Freiburg Acuity Test in Preschool Children: Testability, Test-Retest Variability, and Comparison With LEA Symbols.
    Farassat N; Jehle V; Heinrich SP; Lagrèze WA; Bach M
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Mar; 13(3):14. PubMed ID: 38502142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual Acuity Testing: Feedback Affects Neither Outcome nor Reproducibility, but Leaves Participants Happier.
    Bach M; Schäfer K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147803. PubMed ID: 26824693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual acuities "hand motion" and "counting fingers" can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test.
    Schulze-Bonsel K; Feltgen N; Burau H; Hansen L; Bach M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1236-40. PubMed ID: 16505064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resolving the clinical acuity categories "hand motion" and "counting fingers" using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT).
    Lange C; Feltgen N; Junker B; Schulze-Bonsel K; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 247(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 18766368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of two visual acuity tests in school enrolment examinations : Tumbling E test versus Freiburg visual acuity test].
    Bach M; Reuter M; Lagrèze WA
    Ophthalmologe; 2016 Aug; 113(8):684-9. PubMed ID: 27048550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity.
    Bach M
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jan; 73(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8867682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of three different visual acuity testing procedures in school children.
    Schmidt-Bacher A; Pritsch M; Kolling G
    Strabismus; 2007; 15(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 17523045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of optotype presentation duration on acuity estimates revisited.
    Heinrich SP; Krüger K; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 248(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 20076965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The Freiburg Vision Test. Automated determination of visual acuity].
    Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Apr; 92(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 7780276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the performance of three visual evoked potential-based methods to estimate visual acuity.
    Kurtenbach A; Langrová H; Messias A; Zrenner E; Jägle H
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 126(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 23143759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-based test to measure optimal visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration.
    González EG; Tarita-Nistor L; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4838-45. PubMed ID: 17898311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment: overestimation in amblyopia.
    Wenner Y; Heinrich SP; Beisse C; Fuchs A; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 128(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 24623357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [DIN-compatible vision assessment of increased reproducibility using staircase measurement and maximum likelihood analysis].
    Weigmann U; Petersen J
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 8963126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart].
    Wesemann W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Sep; 219(9):660-7. PubMed ID: 12410466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.
    Beck RW; Moke PS; Turpin AH; Ferris FL; SanGiovanni JP; Johnson CA; Birch EE; Chandler DL; Cox TA; Blair RC; Kraker RT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 12566024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity.
    Simpson TL; Regan D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 72(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7731649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M; Kunawut C; Masayaanon P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):662-9. PubMed ID: 14516806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer monitor pixellation and Sloan letter visual acuity measurement.
    Carkeet A; Lister LJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 29280165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishing Prediction Intervals for the SpeedWheel Acuity Test in Adults and Children.
    Luethy ML; Schötzau A; Palmowski-Wolfe A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2021 Apr; 238(4):488-492. PubMed ID: 33853189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.