BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17219375)

  • 1. Type I error rates in association versus joint linkage/association tests in related individuals.
    Kent JW; Dyer TD; Göring HH; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 17219375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transmission/disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits.
    Zhu X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 11119297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A variance component approach to dichotomous trait linkage analysis using a threshold model.
    Duggirala R; Williams JT; Williams-Blangero S; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):987-92. PubMed ID: 9433612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An efficient, robust and unified method for mapping complex traits (III): combined linkage/linkage-disequilibrium analysis.
    Zhao LP; Quiaoit F; Aragaki C; Hsu L
    Am J Med Genet; 1999 Jun; 84(5):433-53. PubMed ID: 10360398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of variance components and sibpair-based approaches to quantitative trait linkage analysis in unselected samples.
    Williams JT; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(2):113-34. PubMed ID: 10030396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joint segregation and linkage analysis of a quantitative trait compared to separate analyses.
    Gauderman WJ; Faucett CL; Morrison JL; Carpenter CL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):993-8. PubMed ID: 9433613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prior segregation analysis and the power to detect linkage.
    Atwood LD; Slifer SH
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):755-60. PubMed ID: 9433573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of linkage analysis under misclassification error when the genetic model is unknown.
    Martinez M; Khlat M; Leboyer M; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(1):253-8. PubMed ID: 2731714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power comparison of regression methods to test quantitative traits for association and linkage.
    Zhu X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 10797592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust LOD scores for variance component-based linkage analysis.
    Blangero J; Williams JT; Almasy L
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S8-14. PubMed ID: 11055364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bivariate quantitative trait linkage analysis: pleiotropy versus co-incident linkages.
    Almasy L; Dyer TD; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):953-8. PubMed ID: 9433606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods.
    Slager SL; Huang J; Vieland VJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 11180446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian approach to the transmission/disequilibrium test for binary traits.
    George V; Laud PW
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Jan; 22(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 11754472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guess LOD approach: sufficient conditions for robustness.
    Williamson JA; Amos CI
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 7607416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How can maximum likelihood methods reveal candidate gene effects on a quantitative trait?
    Martinez M; Abel L; Demenais F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 8788010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linkage and association.
    Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(6):565-76. PubMed ID: 9811419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconstructing parental genotypes when testing for linkage in the presence of association.
    Knapp M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 11855948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.
    Sham PC; Cherny SS; Purcell S; Hewitt JK
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1616-30. PubMed ID: 10762547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consanguinity and the transmission/disequilibrium test for allelic association.
    Bennett S; Curnow RN
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 21(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 11443735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.