341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17220729)
1. Standardized threshold approach using three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in prostate cancer localization of the entire prostate.
Fütterer JJ; Scheenen TW; Heijmink SW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Heerschap A; Barentsz JO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 17220729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging.
Fütterer JJ; Heijmink SW; Scheenen TW; Veltman J; Huisman HJ; Vos P; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Krabbe PF; Heerschap A; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 16966484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer localization with endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging: effect of clinical data on reader accuracy.
Dhingsa R; Qayyum A; Coakley FV; Lu Y; Jones KD; Swanson MG; Carroll PR; Hricak H; Kurhanewicz J
Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 14695396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of endorectal MRI and MRS in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and previous negative biopsies to localize peripheral zone tumours.
Cirillo S; Petracchini M; Della Monica P; Gallo T; Tartaglia V; Vestita E; Ferrando U; Regge D
Clin Radiol; 2008 Aug; 63(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 18625351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined.
Chen M; Dang HD; Wang JY; Zhou C; Li SY; Wang WC; Zhao WF; Yang ZH; Zhong CY; Li GZ
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):602-10. PubMed ID: 18568549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate depiction at endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging: investigation of a standardized evaluation system.
Jung JA; Coakley FV; Vigneron DB; Swanson MG; Qayyum A; Weinberg V; Jones KD; Carroll PR; Kurhanewicz J
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):701-8. PubMed ID: 15564406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: an initial analysis.
Shukla-Dave A; Hricak H; Kattan MW; Pucar D; Kuroiwa K; Chen HN; Spector J; Koutcher JA; Zakian KL; Scardino PT
BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):786-93. PubMed ID: 17223922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer.
Manenti G; Carlani M; Mancino S; Colangelo V; Di Roma M; Squillaci E; Simonetti G
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):412-9. PubMed ID: 17507813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peripheral zone prostate cancer localization by multiparametric magnetic resonance at 3 T: unbiased cancer identification by matching to histopathology.
Selnæs KM; Heerschap A; Jensen LR; Tessem MB; Schweder GJ; Goa PE; Viset T; Angelsen A; Gribbestad IS
Invest Radiol; 2012 Nov; 47(11):624-33. PubMed ID: 23011187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative 3T MR imaging of rectal cancer: local staging accuracy using a two-dimensional and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence.
Fütterer JJ; Yakar D; Strijk SP; Barentsz JO
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18164156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer: local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging--early experience.
Fütterer JJ; Heijmink SW; Scheenen TW; Jager GJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 16304091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R
Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate cancer: identification with combined diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging--correlation with pathologic findings.
Mazaheri Y; Shukla-Dave A; Hricak H; Fine SW; Zhang J; Inurrigarro G; Moskowitz CS; Ishill NM; Reuter VE; Touijer K; Zakian KL; Koutcher JA
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):480-8. PubMed ID: 18227542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Sciarra A; Panebianco V; Salciccia S; Osimani M; Lisi D; Ciccariello M; Passariello R; Di Silverio F; Gentile V
Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):589-600. PubMed ID: 18226441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerized characterization of prostate cancer by fractal analysis in MR images.
Lv D; Guo X; Wang X; Zhang J; Fang J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jul; 30(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 19557732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology.
Wefer AE; Hricak H; Vigneron DB; Coakley FV; Lu Y; Wefer J; Mueller-Lisse U; Carroll PR; Kurhanewicz J
J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):400-4. PubMed ID: 10893595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Per-sextant localization and staging of prostate cancer: correlation of imaging findings with whole-mount step section histopathology.
Graser A; Heuck A; Sommer B; Massmann J; Scheidler J; Reiser M; Mueller-Lisse U
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 17179349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer: endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging--distinction of true-positive results from chance-detected lesions.
Hom JJ; Coakley FV; Simko JP; Qayyum A; Lu Y; Schmitt L; Carroll PR; Kurhanewicz J
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):192-9. PubMed ID: 16373767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wash-in rate on the basis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: usefulness for prostate cancer detection and localization.
Kim JK; Hong SS; Choi YJ; Park SH; Ahn H; Kim CS; Cho KS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Nov; 22(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 16200542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
