98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17221126)
1. An evaluation of manual and mechanical methods to identify Candida spp. from human and animal sources.
Oliveira Gdos S; Ribeiro ET; Baroni Fde A
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2006; 48(6):311-5. PubMed ID: 17221126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Vitek 2 for identification of yeasts in the clinical laboratory.
Meurman O; Koskensalo A; Rantakokko-Jalava K
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2006 Jun; 12(6):591-3. PubMed ID: 16700713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PCR-AGE, automated and manual methods to identify Candida strains from veterinary sources: a comparative approach.
Brito EH; Brilhante RS; Cordeiro RA; Sidrim JJ; Fontenelle RO; Melo LM; Albuquerque ES; Rocha MF
Vet Microbiol; 2009 Nov; 139(3-4):318-22. PubMed ID: 19592181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card with conventional methods for speciation of Candida.
Sood P; Mishra B; Dogra V; Mandal A
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Apr; 43(2):143-5. PubMed ID: 11217271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of API ID 32C and VITEK-2 to identify Candida dubliniensis.
Cárdenes-Perera CD; Torres-Lana A; Alonso-Vargas R; Moragues-Tosantas MD; Pontón-San Emeterio J; Quindós-Andrés G; Arévalo-Morales MP
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 Nov; 50(3):219-21. PubMed ID: 15541609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Misidentification of Candida auris by RapID Yeast Plus, a Commercial, Biochemical Enzyme-Based Manual Rapid Identification System.
Snayd M; Dias F; Ryan RW; Clout D; Banach DB
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 May; 56(5):. PubMed ID: 29491020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of the new colorimetric VITEK 2 yeast identification card versus the older fluorometric card and of CHROMagar Candida as a source medium with the new card.
Aubertine CL; Rivera M; Rohan SM; Larone DH
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jan; 44(1):227-8. PubMed ID: 16390976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the BD Phoenix system for identification of a wide spectrum of clinically important yeast species: a comparison with Vitek 2-YST.
Won EJ; Shin JH; Kim MN; Choi MJ; Joo MY; Kee SJ; Shin MG; Suh SP; Ryang DW
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2014 Aug; 79(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 24952986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Vitek identification and antifungal susceptibility testing methods to DNA sequencing and Sensititre YeastOne antifungal testing.
Vijgen S; Nys S; Naesens R; Magerman K; Boel A; Cartuyvels R
Med Mycol; 2011 Jan; 49(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 20560861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. COMPARISON BETWEEN FOUR USUAL METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION OF Candida SPECIES.
Souza MN; Ortiz SO; Mello MM; Oliveira Fde M; Severo LC; Goebel CS
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2015; 57(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 26422150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of the API20C AUX system for the identification of clinically important yeasts].
Silva JO; Candido RC
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop; 2005; 38(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 15895181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors accounting for misidentification of Candida species.
Lo HJ; Ho YA; Ho M
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2001 Sep; 34(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 11605807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of PNA FISH® Yeast Traffic Light in identification of Candida species from blood and non-blood culture specimens.
Radic M; Goic-Barisic I; Novak A; Rubic Z; Tonkic M
Med Mycol; 2016 Aug; 54(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 27067303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of Agar Candida ID2 (bioMerieux) a chromogenic medium for yeasts differentiation].
Ciok-Pater E; Zalas P; Gospodarek E
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2006; 58(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 17341000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A comparative study between the Vitek YBC and Microscan Walk Away RYID automated systems with conventional phenotypic methods for the identification of yeasts of clinical interest].
Ferrara G; Mercedes Panizol M; Mazzone M; Delia Pequeneze M; Reviakina V
Invest Clin; 2014 Dec; 55(4):297-310. PubMed ID: 25558750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris Be Reliably Identified in Clinical Microbiology Laboratories?
Mizusawa M; Miller H; Green R; Lee R; Durante M; Perkins R; Hewitt C; Simner PJ; Carroll KC; Hayden RT; Zhang SX
J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 55(2):638-640. PubMed ID: 27881617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of Candida species in the clinical laboratory: a review of conventional, commercial, and molecular techniques.
Neppelenbroek KH; Seó RS; Urban VM; Silva S; Dovigo LN; Jorge JH; Campanha NH
Oral Dis; 2014 May; 20(4):329-44. PubMed ID: 23679136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between multiplex PCR and phenotypic systems for Candida spp. identification.
Liguori G; Gallé F; Lucariello A; Di Onofrio V; Albano L; Mazzarella G; D'Amora M; Rossano F
New Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 33(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 20402415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of new colorimetric vitek 2 yeast identification card by use of different source media.
Valenza G; Strasen J; Schäfer F; Frosch M; Kurzai O; Abele-Horn M
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 46(11):3784-7. PubMed ID: 18799700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of mass spectrometry for the identification of clinically interesting yeasts].
Galán F; García-Agudo L; Guerrero I; Marín P; García-Tapia A; García-Martos P; Rodríguez-Iglesias M
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2015; 33(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 25444360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
