These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17221308)

  • 21. Commentary: the future of forensic functional brain imaging.
    Langleben DD; Dattilio FM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):502-4. PubMed ID: 19092068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lure of lie detectors spooks ethicists.
    Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7096):918-9. PubMed ID: 16791164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Said another way: subject matter experts: facts or fiction?
    Lavin RP; Dreyfus M; Slepski L; Kasper CE
    Nurs Forum; 2007; 42(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 17944700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lying about facial recognition: an fMRI study.
    Bhatt S; Mbwana J; Adeyemo A; Sawyer A; Hailu A; Vanmeter J
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Mar; 69(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 18848742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is forensic science in danger of extinction?
    Pietro DS; Kammrath BW; De Forest PR
    Sci Justice; 2019 Mar; 59(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 30798869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Professionalism--duties and privileges.
    Forrest R
    Sci Justice; 2005; 45(1):1. PubMed ID: 15739686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: the benefit of recalling an event in reverse order.
    Vrij A; Mann SA; Fisher RP; Leal S; Milne R; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 17694424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
    Bond CF; Depaulo BM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assigned versus random, countermeasure-like responses in the p300 based complex trial protocol for detection of deception: task demand effects.
    Meixner JB; Haynes A; Winograd MR; Brown J; Peter Rosenfeld J
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):209-20. PubMed ID: 19543970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An object cue is more effective than a word in ERP-based detection of deception.
    Cutmore TR; Djakovic T; Kebbell MR; Shum DH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Mar; 71(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 18789361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [A nationwide questionnaire survey of medical experts in mental health evaluation].
    Koike J; Morita N; Nakatani Y
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 19301591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. To lie or not to lie: to whom and under what circumstances.
    Perkins SA; Turiel E
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(2):609-21. PubMed ID: 17381793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Palynology: its position in the field of forensic science.
    Walsh KA; Horrocks M
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1053-60. PubMed ID: 18636981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Functional MRI lie detection: too good to be true?
    Simpson JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 19092066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Separating deceptive and orienting components in a Concealed Information Test.
    Ambach W; Stark R; Peper M; Vaitl D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 18674573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conceptualizing and characterizing accuracy in assessments of competence to stand trial.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(3):340-51. PubMed ID: 18802182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the NITV CVSA.
    Hollien H; Harnsberger JD; Martin CA; Hollien KA
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 18279255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to assess eyewitness accuracy and deception.
    Lefebvre CD; Marchand Y; Smith SM; Connolly JF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19303425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of asymmetric vs. symmetric probability of targets following probe and irrelevant stimuli in the complex trial protocol for detection of concealed information with P300.
    Rosenfeld JP; Tang M; Meixner J; Winograd M; Labkovsky E
    Physiol Behav; 2009 Aug; 98(1-2):10-6. PubMed ID: 19374912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.