223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17222475)
1. A virtual-accelerator-based verification of a Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beam treatment planning in clinical situations.
Wieslander E; Knöös T
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Feb; 82(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 17222475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A virtual-accelerator-based verification of a Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beam treatment planning in homogeneous phantoms.
Wieslander E; Knöös T
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1533-44. PubMed ID: 16510961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
Fragoso M; Wen N; Kumar S; Liu D; Ryu S; Movsas B; Munther A; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4445-64. PubMed ID: 20668343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine.
Seco J; Adams E; Bidmead M; Partridge M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 15798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm].
Treutwein M; Bogner L
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Aug; 183(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 17680226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A preliminary study of in-house Monte Carlo simulations: an integrated Monte Carlo verification system.
Mukumoto N; Tsujii K; Saito S; Yasunaga M; Takegawa H; Yamamoto T; Numasaki H; Teshima T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):571-9. PubMed ID: 19735883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system.
Boudreau C; Heath E; Seuntjens J; Ballivy O; Parker W
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 15798262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Absolute dose calculations for Monte Carlo simulations of radiotherapy beams.
Popescu IA; Shaw CP; Zavgorodni SF; Beckham WA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(14):3375-92. PubMed ID: 16177516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical use of a commercial Monte Carlo treatment planning system for electron beams.
Cygler JE; Lochrin C; Daskalov GM; Howard M; Zohr R; Esche B; Eapen L; Grimard L; Caudrelier JM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1029-34. PubMed ID: 15798275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beams using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements.
Edimo P; Clermont C; Kwato MG; Vynckier S
Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 18722148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Monte Carlo-based procedure for independent monitor unit calculation in IMRT treatment plans.
Pisaturo O; Moeckli R; Mirimanoff RO; Bochud FO
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4299-310. PubMed ID: 19531844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo modeling of the ModuLeaf miniature MLC for small field dosimetry and quality assurance of the clinical treatment planning system.
Crop F; Reynaert N; Pittomvils G; Paelinck L; De Gersem W; De Wagter C; Vakaet L; De Neve W; Thierens H
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3275-90. PubMed ID: 17505102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of electron beam obliquity on lateral buildup ratio: a Monte Carlo dosimetry evaluation.
Chow JC; Grigorov GN
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3965-77. PubMed ID: 17664588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Experimental validation of a Monte Carlo-based treatment-planning system for electron beams].
Mika S; Christ G
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Mar; 183(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 17340074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
