BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17222546)

  • 1. Tumour volume and high grade tumour volume are the best predictors of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Chun FK; Briganti A; Jeldres C; Gallina A; Erbersdobler A; Schlomm T; Walz J; Eichelberg C; Salomon G; Haese A; Currlin E; Ahyai SA; Bénard F; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur J Cancer; 2007 Feb; 43(3):536-43. PubMed ID: 17222546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tumour volume is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Nelson BA; Shappell SB; Chang SS; Wells N; Farnham SB; Smith JA; Cookson MS
    BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1169-72. PubMed ID: 16686706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic significance of a positive surgical margin in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Isbarn H; Steuber T; Eichelberg C; Köllermann J; Fisch M; Karakiewicz PI; Huland H; Graefen M; Chun FK
    BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 20128781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Percentage of high-grade tumour volume does not meaningfully improve prediction of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared with Gleason score.
    Hansen J; Bianchi M; Sun M; Rink M; Castiglione F; Abdollah F; Steuber T; Ahyai SA; Steurer S; Göbel C; Freschi M; Montorsi F; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Briganti A; Chun FK
    BJU Int; 2014 Mar; 113(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 24053339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual estimation of tumour extent is not an independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence.
    Jones TD; Koch MO; Lin H; Cheng L
    BJU Int; 2005 Dec; 96(9):1253-7. PubMed ID: 16287440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence.
    Capitanio U; Scattoni V; Freschi M; Briganti A; Salonia A; Gallina A; Colombo R; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    Eur Urol; 2008 Jul; 54(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 18314255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a european multicenter survey of 1,296 patients.
    May M; Knoll N; Siegsmund M; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Hoschke B; Gralla O
    J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1957-62; discussion 1962. PubMed ID: 17868719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
    Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
    BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic assessment of the ability of the number and percentage of positive biopsy cores to predict pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Briganti A; Chun FK; Hutterer GC; Gallina A; Shariat SF; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Valiquette L; Montorsi F; Rigatti P; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):733-43. PubMed ID: 17350750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tumor volume does not predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with surgical Gleason score 6 or less prostate cancer.
    Merrill MM; Lane BR; Reuther AM; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C; Klein EA
    Urology; 2007 Aug; 70(2):294-8. PubMed ID: 17826492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage.
    Budäus L; Isbarn H; Eichelberg C; Lughezzani G; Sun M; Perrotte P; Chun FK; Salomon G; Steuber T; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Fisch M; Schlomm T; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1341-6. PubMed ID: 20723925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Carter HB; Peck HJ; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. PubMed ID: 17698121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk-adjusted hazard rates of biochemical recurrence for prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.
    Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):412-19. PubMed ID: 19027223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Percentages of positive cores, cancer length and Gleason grade 4/5 cancer in systematic sextant biopsy are all predictive of adverse pathology and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Suekane S; Noguchi M; Nakashima O; Yamada S; Kojiro M; Matsuoka K
    Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 17681061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic value of surgical margin status for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Hashimoto K; Masumori N; Takei F; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Itoh N; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 18203710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.
    Boorjian SA; Thompson RH; Siddiqui S; Bagniewski S; Bergstralh EJ; Karnes RJ; Frank I; Blute ML
    J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):864-70; discussion 870-1. PubMed ID: 17631342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The prognostic role of the pathological T2 subclassification for prostate cancer in the 2002 Tumour-Nodes-Metastasis staging system.
    van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Kok DE; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA
    BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 18336608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.