176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17222733)
1. A novel two-dimensional echocardiographic image analysis system using artificial intelligence-learned pattern recognition for rapid automated ejection fraction.
Cannesson M; Tanabe M; Suffoletto MS; McNamara DM; Madan S; Lacomis JM; Gorcsan J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 49(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 17222733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by the axius auto ejection fraction method: comparison with manual trace method and visual assessment of ejection fraction].
Kawai J; Tanabe K; Yamaguchi K; Hosoi Y; Watanabe M; Tani T; Yagi T; Fujii Y; Konda T; Sumida T; Nakamura H; Ui K; Yoneyama A; Morioka S; Kihara Y
J Cardiol; 2007 Mar; 49(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 17444138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of left ventricular volumes with echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: real-life evaluation of standard versus new semiautomatic methods.
Aurich M; André F; Keller M; Greiner S; Hess A; Buss SJ; Katus HA; Mereles D
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Oct; 27(10):1017-24. PubMed ID: 25129394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unsupervised fully automated inline analysis of global left ventricular function in CINE MR imaging.
Theisen D; Sandner TA; Bauner K; Hayes C; Rist C; Reiser MF; Wintersperger BJ
Invest Radiol; 2009 Aug; 44(8):463-8. PubMed ID: 19561514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical utility of automated assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using artificial intelligence-assisted border detection.
Rahmouni HW; Ky B; Plappert T; Duffy K; Wiegers SE; Ferrari VA; Keane MG; Kirkpatrick JN; Silvestry FE; St John Sutton M
Am Heart J; 2008 Mar; 155(3):562-70. PubMed ID: 18294497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of myocardial strain to assess global left ventricular function: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and 3-dimensional echocardiography.
Brown J; Jenkins C; Marwick TH
Am Heart J; 2009 Jan; 157(1):102.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19081404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cardiac image modeling tool for quantitative analysis of global and regional cardiac wall motion.
Hung J; Francois C; Nelson NA; Young A; Cowan BR; Jerecic R; Carr J
Invest Radiol; 2009 May; 44(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 19346964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using freehand transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Mannaerts HF; Van Der Heide JA; Kamp O; Papavassiliu T; Marcus JT; Beek A; Van Rossum AC; Twisk J; Visser CA
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2003 Feb; 16(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 12574735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconstructed versus real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Jenkins C; Leano R; Chan J; Marwick TH
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2007 Jul; 20(7):862-8. PubMed ID: 17617313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of contrast agent-enhanced versus non-contrast agent-enhanced real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for analysis of left ventricular systolic function.
Krenning BJ; Kirschbaum SW; Soliman OI; Nemes A; van Geuns RJ; Vletter WB; Veltman CE; Ten Cate FJ; Roelandt JR; Geleijnse ML
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Nov; 100(9):1485-9. PubMed ID: 17950813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New digital measurement methods for left ventricular volume using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with electromagnetic flow method and magnetic resonance imaging.
Qin JJ; Jones M; Shiota T; Greenberg NL; Firstenberg MS; Tsujino H; Zetts AD; Sun JP; Cardon LA; Odabashian JA; Flamm SD; White RD; Panza JA; Thomas JD
Eur J Echocardiogr; 2000 Jun; 1(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 12086214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid full volume data acquisition by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular indexes in children: a validation study compared with magnetic resonance imaging.
Bu L; Munns S; Zhang H; Disterhoft M; Dixon M; Stolpen A; Sonka M; Scholz TD; Mahoney LT; Ge S
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2005 Apr; 18(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 15846155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fully Automated Versus Standard Tracking of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Longitudinal Strain: The FAST-EFs Multicenter Study.
Knackstedt C; Bekkers SC; Schummers G; Schreckenberg M; Muraru D; Badano LP; Franke A; Bavishi C; Omar AM; Sengupta PP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Sep; 66(13):1456-66. PubMed ID: 26403342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New generation 3-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular volumetric and functional measurements: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
Nikitin NP; Constantin C; Loh PH; Ghosh J; Lukaschuk EI; Bennett A; Hurren S; Alamgir F; Clark AL; Cleland JG
Eur J Echocardiogr; 2006 Oct; 7(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 16916621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Left ventricular papillary muscles and trabeculae are significant determinants of cardiac MRI volumetric measurements: effects on clinical standards in patients with advanced systolic dysfunction.
Weinsaft JW; Cham MD; Janik M; Min JK; Henschke CI; Yankelevitz DF; Devereux RB
Int J Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 126(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 17698216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Real-time simultaneous triplane contrast echocardiography gives rapid, accurate, and reproducible assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Malm S; Frigstad S; Sagberg E; Steen PA; Skjarpe T
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 Dec; 19(12):1494-501. PubMed ID: 17138035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accurate, simplified and rapid three-dimensional echocardiographic volume quantifications: Comparison of different algorithms in symmetric and asymmetric left ventricular geometry.
Müller S; Schocke M; Hunold P; Pachinger O; Bartel T
Can J Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 20(11):1091-6. PubMed ID: 15457304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative importance of errors in left ventricular quantitation by two-dimensional echocardiography: insights from three-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Chukwu EO; Barasch E; Mihalatos DG; Katz A; Lachmann J; Han J; Reichek N; Gopal AS
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2008 Sep; 21(9):990-7. PubMed ID: 18765174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved interobserver variability and accuracy of echocardiographic visual left ventricular ejection fraction assessment through a self-directed learning program using cardiac magnetic resonance images.
Thavendiranathan P; Popović ZB; Flamm SD; Dahiya A; Grimm RA; Marwick TH
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2013 Nov; 26(11):1267-73. PubMed ID: 23993695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual estimation versus quantitative assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction: a comparison by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
Sievers B; Kirchberg S; Franken U; Puthenveettil BJ; Bakan A; Trappe HJ
Am Heart J; 2005 Oct; 150(4):737-42. PubMed ID: 16209976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
