BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17223092)

  • 1. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
    Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential.
    Munka L; Berti S
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16356637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance.
    Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Winkler I; Horváth J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1704-13. PubMed ID: 16269107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development of involuntary and voluntary attention from childhood to adulthood: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Wetzel N; Widmann A; Berti S; Schröger E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Oct; 117(10):2191-203. PubMed ID: 16926109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Graded visual attention modulates brain responses evoked by task-irrelevant auditory pitch changes.
    Yucel G; Petty C; McCarthy G; Belger A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1819-28. PubMed ID: 16356321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study.
    Sabri M; Liebenthal E; Waldron EJ; Medler DA; Binder JR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):689-700. PubMed ID: 16768370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Novitski N; Alho K; Korzyukov O; Carlson S; Martinkauppi S; Escera C; Rinne T; Aronen HJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preattentive representation of feature conjunctions for concurrent spatially distributed auditory objects.
    Takegata R; Brattico E; Tervaniemi M; Varyagina O; Näätänen R; Winkler I
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 15953710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain electric activity for active inhibition of auditory irrelevant information.
    Araki T; Kasai K; Nakagome K; Fukuda M; Itoh K; Koshida I; Kato N; Iwanami A
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Feb; 374(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 15631887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related brain potentials to irrelevant auditory stimuli during selective listening: effects of channel probability.
    Akai T
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):193-204. PubMed ID: 15032985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of attentional load on auditory scene analysis.
    Alain C; Izenberg A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Oct; 15(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 14614816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction.
    Roeber U; Berti S; Widmann A; Schröger E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):451-6. PubMed ID: 15722214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter-modal attention: ERPs to auditory targets in an inter-modal oddball task.
    Brown CR; Clarke AR; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 16529831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pre-attentive and attentive processing of temporal and frequency characteristics within long sounds.
    Grimm S; Schröger E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):711-21. PubMed ID: 16253485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional load of the primary task influences the frontal but not the temporal generators of mismatch negativity.
    Restuccia D; Della Marca G; Marra C; Rubino M; Valeriani M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):891-9. PubMed ID: 16289727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
    Beer AL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
    Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.