These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Grouping Effects on Foveal Spatial Interactions in Children. Waugh SJ; Formankiewicz MA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2020 May; 61(5):23. PubMed ID: 32413126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Feature detection and letter identification. Pelli DG; Burns CW; Farell B; Moore-Page DC Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(28):4646-74. PubMed ID: 16808957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Learning to identify near-acuity letters, either with or without flankers, results in improved letter size and spacing limits in adults with amblyopia. Chung ST; Li RW; Levi DM PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35829. PubMed ID: 22558234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Separate first- and second-order processing is supported by spatial summation estimates at the fovea and eccentrically. Sukumar S; Waugh SJ Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(5):581-96. PubMed ID: 17275063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Linking crowding, visual span, and reading. He Y; Legge GE J Vis; 2017 Sep; 17(11):11. PubMed ID: 28973564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Ideal observer analysis of crowding and the reduction of crowding through learning. Sun GJ; Chung ST; Tjan BS J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):16. PubMed ID: 20616136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Individual Letter Contrast Thresholds: Effect of Object Frequency and Noise. Hall C; Wang S; McAnany JJ Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1125-32. PubMed ID: 26540471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers. Simmers AJ; Gray LS; McGraw PV; Winn B Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 May; 19(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 10627844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Scale dependence and channel switching in letter identification. Oruç I; Landy MS J Vis; 2009 Aug; 9(9):4.1-19. PubMed ID: 19761337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification. Pelli DG; Levi DM; Chung ST J Vis; 2004 Oct; 4(10):904-20. PubMed ID: 15595894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Texture segmentation along the horizontal meridian: nonmonotonic changes in performance with eccentricity. Gurnsey R; Pearson P; Day D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):738-57. PubMed ID: 8666961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Anisotropic local contrast normalization: the role of stimulus orientation and spatial frequency bandwidths in the oblique and horizontal effect perceptual anisotropies. Hansen BC; Essock EA Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(26):4398-415. PubMed ID: 17027896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. How does the short-wavelength-sensitive contrast sensitivity function for detection and resolution change with age in the periphery? Beirne RO; Zlatkova MB; Chang CK; Chakravarthy U; Anderson RS Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(18):1894-901. PubMed ID: 18585404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effects of number, complexity, and familiarity of flankers on crowded letter identification. Chanceaux M; Mathôt S; Grainger J J Vis; 2014 Nov; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 25384390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Suppression pathways saturate with contrast for parallel surrounds but not for superimposed cross-oriented masks. Meese TS; Challinor KL; Summers RJ; Baker DH Vision Res; 2009 Dec; 49(24):2927-35. PubMed ID: 19765604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]