These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17223771)

  • 21. Privacy protection: implications for public health researchers.
    Lane MJ
    Med J Aust; 1991 Dec 2-16; 155(11-12):831-3. PubMed ID: 11652181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maximizing value and minimizing barriers: Patient-centered community consultation for research in emergency settings.
    Fordyce CB; Roe MT; Dickert NW
    Clin Trials; 2017 Feb; 14(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 27798377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research.
    Cassell J; Young A
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Oct; 28(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 12356960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research.
    Ballantyne A; Schaefer GO
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 44(6):392-396. PubMed ID: 29358219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implementation of community consultation for waiver of informed consent in emergency research: one Institutional Review Board's experience.
    Dix ES; Esposito D; Spinosa F; Olson N; Chapman S
    J Investig Med; 2004 Mar; 52(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 15068227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ethical considerations in biomedical research: a personal view.
    Dahlöf C
    Cephalalgia; 2013 Jun; 33(8):507-11. PubMed ID: 23671248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Minimal-risk waiver of informed consent and exception from informed consent (Final Rule) studies at institutional review boards nationwide.
    Ernst AA; Weiss SJ; Nick TG; Iserson K; Biros MH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1134-7. PubMed ID: 16264084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ethical approval in studies raising consent issues.
    Nicholson C
    Nurs Times; 2015 Jan 14-20; 111(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 26021031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Big Data and Health Research-The Governance Challenges in a Mixed Data Economy.
    Holm S; Ploug T
    J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Dec; 14(4):515-525. PubMed ID: 28980135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Protecting human research from an invasion of privacy: the unintended results of the Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988.
    Bentley-Cooper JE
    Aust J Public Health; 1991 Sep; 15(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1932329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of Personal Health Information under Consent - Exempt Circumstances for Research: Views of the Australian General Public.
    Carter DJ
    J Law Med; 2021 Mar; 28(3):780-797. PubMed ID: 34369130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical research 2: legal and ethical issues in research.
    Endacott R
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2004 Oct; 20(5):313-5. PubMed ID: 15450620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ethical considerations in recruiting primary care patients to research studies.
    Barton CA; Tam CW; Abbott P; Liaw ST
    Aust Fam Physician; 2016 Mar; 45(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 27052053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Working with the institutional review board.
    Byerly WG
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Jan; 66(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 19139484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Research on human subjects: Australian ethics committees take tentative steps.
    Osborne LW
    J Med Ethics; 1983 Jun; 9(2):66-8. PubMed ID: 6876099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When is it impractical to ask informed consent? A systematic review.
    Laurijssen SJ; van der Graaf R; van Dijk WB; Schuit E; Groenwold RH; Grobbee DE; de Vries MC
    Clin Trials; 2022 Oct; 19(5):545-560. PubMed ID: 35775421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
    Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do Australian researchers accept committee review and conduct ethical research?
    McNeill PM; Berglund CA; Webster IW
    Soc Sci Med; 1992 Aug; 35(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 1519084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?
    Angell E; Tarrant C; Dixon-Woods M
    J Clin Pathol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):825-9. PubMed ID: 19734481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.