176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17223933)
1. Magnetic resonance colonography vs computed tomography colonography for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: an indirect comparison.
Purkayastha S; Athanasiou T; Tekkis PP; Constantinides V; Teare J; Darzi AW
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Feb; 9(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 17223933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance colonography versus colonoscopy as a diagnostic investigation for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Negus R; Gedroyc W; Darzi AW
Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):980-9. PubMed ID: 16124980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy.
Rosman AS; Korsten MA
Am J Med; 2007 Mar; 120(3):203-210.e4. PubMed ID: 17349438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.
Graser A; Melzer A; Lindner E; Nagel D; Herrmann K; Stieber P; Schirra J; Mansmann U; Reiser MF; Göke B; Kolligs FT
Gastroenterology; 2013 Apr; 144(4):743-750.e2. PubMed ID: 23415805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia.
Cotton PB; Durkalski VL; Pineau BC; Palesch YY; Mauldin PD; Hoffman B; Vining DJ; Small WC; Affronti J; Rex D; Kopecky KK; Ackerman S; Burdick JS; Brewington C; Turner MA; Zfass A; Wright AR; Iyer RB; Lynch P; Sivak MV; Butler H
JAMA; 2004 Apr; 291(14):1713-9. PubMed ID: 15082698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT colonography for detection and characterisation of synchronous proximal colonic lesions in patients with stenosing colorectal cancer.
Park SH; Lee JH; Lee SS; Kim JC; Yu CS; Kim HC; Ye BD; Kim MJ; Kim AY; Ha HK
Gut; 2012 Dec; 61(12):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22115824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.
Laghi A; Iannaccone R; Carbone I; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Di Giulio E; Schillaci A; Passariello R
Endoscopy; 2002 Jun; 34(6):441-6. PubMed ID: 12048624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should computed tomographic colonography replace optical colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer?
Veerappan GR; Cash BD
Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2009 Apr; 119(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 19413183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel pathway for investigation of colorectal symptoms with colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography.
Sanders AD; Stevenson C; Pearson J; Burt M; McGeoch G; Hudson B; Eglinton TW
N Z Med J; 2013 Sep; 126(1382):45-57. PubMed ID: 24154769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population.
Graser A; Stieber P; Nagel D; Schäfer C; Horst D; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Lottes A; Geisbüsch S; Kramer H; Wagner AC; Diepolder H; Schirra J; Roth HJ; Seidel D; Göke B; Reiser MF; Kolligs FT
Gut; 2009 Feb; 58(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 18852257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for the detection of colonic neoplasia after positive faecal occult blood testing: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Plumb AA; Halligan S; Pendsé DA; Taylor SA; Mallett S
Eur Radiol; 2014 May; 24(5):1049-58. PubMed ID: 24519111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil.
Achiam MP; Chabanova E; Løgager VB; Andersen LP; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 18423314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy and tolerability of contrast enhanced CT colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer.
Ozsunar Y; Coskun G; Delibaş N; Uz B; Yükselen V
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 18597964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Halligan S; Marmo R
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):393-405. PubMed ID: 21415247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time requirements and health effects of participation in colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography in a randomized controlled trial.
van Dam L; de Wijkerslooth TR; de Haan MC; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Fockens P; Thomeer M; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME; van Ballegooijen M; Stoker J; Dekker E; Steyerberg EW
Endoscopy; 2013; 45(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 23446667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results.
Hoppe H; Netzer P; Spreng A; Quattropani C; Mattich J; Dinkel HP
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1924-35. PubMed ID: 15447751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT- and MR colonography.
Achiam MP; Bülow S; Rosenberg J
Scand J Surg; 2002; 91(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 12558079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison.
Rockey DC; Paulson E; Niedzwiecki D; Davis W; Bosworth HB; Sanders L; Yee J; Henderson J; Hatten P; Burdick S; Sanyal A; Rubin DT; Sterling M; Akerkar G; Bhutani MS; Binmoeller K; Garvie J; Bini EJ; McQuaid K; Foster WL; Thompson WM; Dachman A; Halvorsen R
Lancet; 2005 Jan 22-28; 365(9456):305-11. PubMed ID: 15664225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography colonography and colonoscopy: a prospective and validated analysis of 231 paired examinations.
Arnesen RB; von Benzon E; Adamsen S; Svendsen LB; Raaschou HO; Hansen OH
Acta Radiol; 2007 Oct; 48(8):831-7. PubMed ID: 17924213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in an FOBT positive screening population.
Liedenbaum MH; de Vries AH; van Rijn AF; Dekker HM; Willemssen FE; van Leerdam ME; van Marrewijk CJ; Fockens P; Bipat S; Bossuyt PM; Dekker E; Stoker J
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Dec; 35(6):661-8. PubMed ID: 19888629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
