1081 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17224151)
1. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Ross R
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17224151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Delayed blastocyst transfer: is the window shutting?
Van Voorhis BJ; Dokras A
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 17511991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos.
Richter KS; Shipley SK; McVearry I; Tucker MJ; Widra EA
Fertil Steril; 2006 Oct; 86(4):862-6. PubMed ID: 16935284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Similar ongoing pregnancy rates after blastocyst transfer in fresh donor cycles and autologous cycles using cryopreserved bipronuclear oocytes suggest similar viability of transferred blastocysts.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Hudson C; Thomas S
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):319-21. PubMed ID: 19683230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cryopreservation of supernumerary high quality embryos predicts favorable outcomes for patients undergoing repeated cycles of in vitro fertilization.
Wang JG; Douglas NC; Dicken C; Nakhuda GS; Guarnaccia MM; Sauer MV
Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):368-74. PubMed ID: 17509594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cryopreservation of blastocysts is the most feasible strategy in good responder patients.
Mesut N; Ciray HN; Mesut A; Aksoy T; Bahceci M
Fertil Steril; 2011 Nov; 96(5):1121-5.e1. PubMed ID: 21890133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Embryo cryopreservation rescues cycles with premature luteinization.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Hudson C; Thomas S
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):636-41. PubMed ID: 19296941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Hudson C; Thomas S
Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):344-8. PubMed ID: 21737072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revealing the enigmas of implantation: what is the true impact of ovarian hyperstimulation?
Oehninger S
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17678916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in anonymous shared versus exclusive donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles.
Mullin CM; Fino ME; Talebian S; Keegan D; Grifo JA; Licciardi F
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):574-8. PubMed ID: 19815192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application.
Liebermann J; Tucker MJ
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 16762345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should embryos developing to blastocysts on day 7 be cryopreserved and transferred: an analysis of pregnancy and implantation rates.
Kovalevsky G; Carney SM; Morrison LS; Boylan CF; Neithardt AB; Feinberg RF
Fertil Steril; 2013 Oct; 100(4):1008-12. PubMed ID: 23876530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients.
Grifo JA; Noyes N
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 19439285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Restrepo H; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Hudson C
Fertil Steril; 2013 Feb; 99(2):389-92. PubMed ID: 23062733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in natural or down-regulated hormonally controlled cycles: a retrospective study.
Gelbaya TA; Nardo LG; Hunter HR; Fitzgerald CT; Horne G; Pease EE; Brison DR; Lieberman BA
Fertil Steril; 2006 Mar; 85(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 16500326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cryopreserved blastocyst transfer: impact of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus antagonist in the previous oocyte retrieval cycles.
Lee JR; Choi YS; Jee BC; Ku SY; Suh CS; Kim KC; Lee WD; Kim SH
Fertil Steril; 2007 Nov; 88(5):1344-9. PubMed ID: 17548083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical experience employing co-culture of human embryos with autologous human endometrial epithelial cells.
Rubio C; Simón C; Mercader A; Garcia-Velasco J; Remohí J; Pellicer A
Hum Reprod; 2000 Dec; 15 Suppl 6():31-8. PubMed ID: 11261481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High ongoing pregnancy rates after deferred transfer through bipronuclear oocyte cryopreservation and post-thaw extended culture.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Hudson C; Thomas S
Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1594-9. PubMed ID: 19006793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pregnancy rates in donor oocyte cycles compared to similar autologous in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 26,457 fresh cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Yeh JS; Steward RG; Dude AM; Shah AA; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 24842672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles.
Frattarelli JL; Miller KA; Miller BT; Elkind-Hirsch K; Scott RT
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17765235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
