These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17224745)

  • 1. Trained artificial neural network for glaucoma diagnosis using visual field data: a comparison with conventional algorithms.
    Bizios D; Heijl A; Bengtsson B
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 17224745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of input data on the performance of a neural network in distinguishing normal and glaucomatous visual fields.
    Bengtsson B; Bizios D; Heijl A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 46(10):3730-6. PubMed ID: 16186356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of methods used to determine the progression of visual field defects in glaucoma.
    Mayama C; Araie M; Suzuki Y; Ishida K; Yamamoto T; Kitazawa Y; Shirakashi M; Abe H; Tsukamoto H; Mishima HK; Yoshimura K; Ohashi Y
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2117-25. PubMed ID: 15522380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
    Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of clinicians and an artificial neural network regarding accuracy and certainty in performance of visual field assessment for the diagnosis of glaucoma.
    Andersson S; Heijl A; Bizios D; Bengtsson B
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):413-7. PubMed ID: 22583841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
    Oddone F; Centofanti M; Rossetti L; Iester M; Fogagnolo P; Capris E; Manni G
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Aug; 115(8):1358-65, 1365.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18321579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural networks for visual field analysis: how do they compare with other algorithms?
    Lietman T; Eng J; Katz J; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Feb; 8(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 10084278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.
    King AJ; Taguri A; Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 240(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 12107516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glaucoma probability score vs Moorfields classification in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes.
    Moreno-Montañés J; Antón A; García N; Mendiluce L; Ayala E; Sebastián A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):360-368. PubMed ID: 18045569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of the Humphrey perimetry programs SITA Standard and SITA Fast in normal probands and patients with glaucoma].
    Nordmann JP; Brion F; Hamard P; Mouton-Chopin D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Oct; 21(8):549-54. PubMed ID: 9833219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
    Wild JM; Pacey IE; O'Neill EC; Cunliffe IA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-assisted interpretation of visual fields in glaucoma.
    Asman P
    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (1985); 1992; (206):1-47. PubMed ID: 1467748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography (StratusOCT).
    Nouri-Mahdavi K; Nikkhou K; Hoffman DC; Law SK; Caprioli J
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 18414102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.