172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17224751)
1. Noninvasive determination of intraocular pressure (IOP) in nonsedated mice of 5 different inbred strains.
Nissirios N; Goldblum D; Rohrer K; Mittag T; Danias J
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 17224751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noninvasive measurement of rodent intraocular pressure with a rebound tonometer.
Wang WH; Millar JC; Pang IH; Wax MB; Clark AF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4617-21. PubMed ID: 16303957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on the intraocular pressure measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometer and ocular blood flow pneumatonometer.
Saleh TA; Adams M; McDermott B; Claridge KG; Ewings P
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 34(6):516-20. PubMed ID: 16925697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Sahin A; Niyaz L; Yildirim N
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007; 35(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 17539785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on intraocular pressure measured by tono-pen and rebound tonometer in children.
Sahin A; Basmak H; Yildirim N
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 18303387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen.
Bhan A; Browning AC; Shah S; Hamilton R; Dave D; Dua HS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 May; 43(5):1389-92. PubMed ID: 11980851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive tonometry in the mouse.
Morris CA; Crowston JG; Lindsey JD; Danias J; Weinreb RN
Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jun; 82(6):1094-9. PubMed ID: 16466714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of three intraocular pressure measurement methods including biomechanical properties of the cornea.
Smedowski A; Weglarz B; Tarnawska D; Kaarniranta K; Wylegala E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Feb; 55(2):666-73. PubMed ID: 24425850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of rebound tonometer and Goldmann handheld applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Saenz-Frances F; Vizzeri G; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 19142135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4410-4. PubMed ID: 17003433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Central corneal thickness does not correlate with TonoLab-measured IOP in several mouse strains with single transgenic mutations of matricellular proteins.
Chatterjee A; Oh DJ; Kang MH; Rhee DJ
Exp Eye Res; 2013 Oct; 115():106-12. PubMed ID: 23806329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice.
Danias J; Kontiola AI; Filippopoulos T; Mittag T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1138-41. PubMed ID: 12601041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictability and limitations of non-invasive murine tonometry: comparison of two devices.
Filippopoulos T; Matsubara A; Danias J; Huang W; Dobberfuhl A; Ren L; Mittag T; Miller JW; Grosskreutz CL
Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jul; 83(1):194-201. PubMed ID: 16564045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two handheld applanation tonometers and the association of central corneal thickness, age, and intraocular pressure in normal and diseased canine eyes.
Kato K
Vet Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 17(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 24517734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry.
Chui WS; Lam A; Chen D; Chiu R
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jan; 115(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 17573114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology.
Browning AC; Bhan A; Rotchford AP; Shah S; Dua HS
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Nov; 88(11):1395-9. PubMed ID: 15489480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
