672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17224774)
1. Did the Medicare inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system result in changes in relative patient severity and relative resource use?
Paddock SM; Escarce JJ; Hayden O; Buntin MB
Med Care; 2007 Feb; 45(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 17224774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early effects of the prospective payment system on inpatient rehabilitation hospital performance.
McCue MJ; Thompson JM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 87(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 16442972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.
Cromwell J; Drozd EM; Gage B; Maier J; Richter E; Goldman HH
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2005 Mar; 8(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 15870482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicare program; inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for federal fiscal year 2008. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2007 Aug; 72(151):44283-335. PubMed ID: 17687798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rehabilitation costs: implications for prospective payment.
Schlenker RE; Kramer AM; Hrincevich CA; Eilertsen TB
Health Serv Res; 1997 Dec; 32(5):651-68. PubMed ID: 9402906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medicare program; changes to the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system and fiscal year 2004 rates. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2003 Aug; 68(148):45673-728. PubMed ID: 12901386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medicare program; inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for FY 2006. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2005 Aug; 70(156):47879-8006. PubMed ID: 16106591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medicare program; prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2001 Aug; 66(152):41315-430. PubMed ID: 11794307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The early impact of the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system on stroke rehabilitation case mix, practice patterns, and outcomes.
DeJong G; Horn SD; Smout RJ; Ryser DK
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12 Suppl 2):S93-S100. PubMed ID: 16373144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a resource-based patient classification scheme for rehabilitation.
Harada N; Kominski G; Sofaer S
Inquiry; 1993; 30(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 8454315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Final inpatient rehabilitation PPS rule improves on proposed rule.
Reynolds M
Healthc Financ Manage; 2001 Oct; 55(10):68-70. PubMed ID: 11588870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of institutional services and characteristics on use of postacute care settings.
Buczko W
J Health Hum Serv Adm; 2001; 24(1):103-32. PubMed ID: 12134560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does competition under Medicare Prospective Payment selectively reduce expenditures on high-cost patients?
Meltzer D; Chung J; Basu A
Rand J Econ; 2002; 33(3):447-68. PubMed ID: 12585302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rethinking rehabilitation. PPS means big changes for providers and rehabilitation companies.
Ross J
Subacute Care; 1996; 3(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 10157768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of the prospective payment system on speech-language pathology services.
Frymark TB; Mullen RC
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Jan; 84(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 15632484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do older Medicare patients cost hospitals more? Evidence from an academic medical center.
Rosenthal GE; Landefeld CS
Arch Intern Med; 1993 Jan; 153(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 8422203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups.
Sedman AB; Bahl V; Bunting E; Bandy K; Jones S; Nasr SZ; Schulz K; Campbell DA
Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):965-9. PubMed ID: 15466092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medicare prospective payment and quality of care for long-stay nursing facility residents.
Konetzka RT; Norton EC; Sloane PD; Kilpatrick KE; Stearns SC
Med Care; 2006 Mar; 44(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 16501399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The distributional implications of using relative prices in DRG payment systems.
Thorpe KE
Inquiry; 1987; 24(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 2951338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
