These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17225334)
21. A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia. Grant ER; Cleaver CA Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):99-256. PubMed ID: 11651215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Will society defend our right to live? Ackerman F; Silverman H; Cohen C; Meisel A N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11646823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Hastings Center guidelines on forgoing treatment. Mead AP Clin Ethics Rep; 1988; 2(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11651918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The discontinuation of life support measures in patients in a permanent vegetative state. Bonito V; Primavera A; Borghi L; Mori M; Defanti CA; Neurol Sci; 2002 Sep; 23(3):131-9. PubMed ID: 12398069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The limitations of legislation. Orentlicher D MD Law Rev; 1994; 53():1255-305. PubMed ID: 11657533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Who decides when care is futile? Ayres SM Hosp Pract; 1991 Sep; 26(9A):41-53. PubMed ID: 11652600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Ethical issues in adult resuscitation. Crimmins TJ Ann Emerg Med; 1993 Feb; 22(2 Part 2):495-501. PubMed ID: 11659615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from minimally conscious patients: who decides? Anderson BJ J Med Pract Manage; 2002; 18(2):101-3. PubMed ID: 12389332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The ultimate decision. Malcolm AH N Y Times Mag; 1989 Dec; ():38-41, 50, 54-5. PubMed ID: 11646318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology. Richardson E Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards. Strasser M KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Appointing a proxy under the best of circumstances. White PD Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 11656534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Second-generation advance directives: will reforming the law improve the practice? Keyserlingk EW Humane Med; 1993 Jan; 9(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 11652942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center. Kirkpatrick GA Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11644323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: prescription or technologic placebo. Noseworthy T Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1992 Dec; 25(7):453-6. PubMed ID: 11654008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative. Tomlinson AK Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Death Before Birth: The Ethicaland Legal Landscape. Eisenberg L Am J Bioeth; 2017 Jul; 17(7):81-82. PubMed ID: 28661742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The care of the dying: a symposium on the case of Betty Wright -- Dying patients: who's in control? Childress JF Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 11644392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]