These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17225402)

  • 1. Modal decomposition method for acoustic impedance testing in square ducts.
    Schultz T; Cattafesta LN; Sheplak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3750-8. PubMed ID: 17225402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method to determine the acoustic reflection and absorption coefficients of porous media by using modal dispersion in a waveguide.
    Prisutova J; Horoshenkov K; Groby JP; Brouard B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):2947. PubMed ID: 25480044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurements of the acoustic input impedance of cat ears: 10 Hz to 20 kHz.
    Lynch TJ; Peake WT; Rosowski JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2184-209. PubMed ID: 7963032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calculations of modes in circumferentially nonuniform lined ducts.
    Bi W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2603-12. PubMed ID: 18529180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An improved multimodal method for sound propagation in nonuniform lined ducts.
    Bi W; Pagneux V; Lafarge D; Aurégan Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):280-90. PubMed ID: 17614488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failure of the Ingard-Myers boundary condition for a lined duct: an experimental investigation.
    Renou Y; Aurégan Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 21786877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian identification of acoustic impedance in treated ducts.
    Buot de l'Épine Y; Chazot JD; Ville JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):EL114-9. PubMed ID: 26233052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient.
    Keefe DH; Ling R; Bulen JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):470-85. PubMed ID: 1737890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of perforation impedance on the transmission loss of reactive and dissipative silencers.
    Lee I; Selamet A; Huff NT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3706-13. PubMed ID: 17225397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic radiation impedance of rectangular pistons on prolate spheroids.
    Boisvert JE; Van Buren AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Feb; 111(2):867-74. PubMed ID: 11865818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Piezoacoustic wave spectra using improved surface impedance matrix: application to high impedance-contrast layered plates.
    Zhang VY; Dubus B; Collet B; Destrade M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):1972-82. PubMed ID: 18397005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sound-power collection by the auditory periphery of the mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus. II. External-ear radiation impedance and power collection.
    Ravicz ME; Rosowski JJ; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 May; 99(5):3044-63. PubMed ID: 8642116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic scattering by a sphere with a hemispherically split boundary condition.
    Treeby BE; Pan J; Paurobally RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 17614464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A real-time plane-wave decomposition algorithm for characterizing perforated liners damping at multiple mode frequencies.
    Zhao D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1184-92. PubMed ID: 21428482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic performance analysis of wooden structure building wall by integrating BIM technology and impedance tube method.
    Yin J; Ai X
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0308481. PubMed ID: 39121092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrostatic Acoustic Sensor with an Impedance-Matched Diaphragm Characterized for Body Sound Monitoring.
    Rennoll V; McLane I; Eisape A; Grant D; Hahn H; Elhilali M; West JE
    ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2023 Aug; 6(8):3241-3256. PubMed ID: 37470762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Broadband impedance boundary conditions for the simulation of sound propagation in the time domain.
    Bin J; Yousuff Hussaini M; Lee S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):664-75. PubMed ID: 19206844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transmission characteristics of a tee-junction in a rectangular duct at higher-order modes.
    Lau SK; Leung KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3028-39. PubMed ID: 20000916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reciprocity in the scattering coefficients of acoustic waveguide modes.
    Tong Y; Pan J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):1731-4. PubMed ID: 23967907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental investigation of an inversion technique for the determination of broadband duct mode amplitudes by the use of near-field sensor arrays.
    Castres FO; Joseph PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):848-59. PubMed ID: 17672635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.