These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17225419)

  • 1. The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: effects of stimulus level.
    Bernstein JG; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3916-28. PubMed ID: 17225419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: sensorineural hearing loss.
    Bernstein JG; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3929-45. PubMed ID: 17225420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity.
    Moore BC; Peters RW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2881-93. PubMed ID: 1629481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Difference limens for phase in normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1351-65. PubMed ID: 2808909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?
    Bernstein JG; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3323-34. PubMed ID: 12822804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Across-frequency pitch discrimination interference between complex tones containing resolved harmonics.
    Micheyl C; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1621-31. PubMed ID: 17407899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the Pitch Strength of Bandpass Noise in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Horbach M; Verhey JL; Hots J
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787067. PubMed ID: 30009682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential F0 comparisons between resolved and unresolved harmonics: no evidence for translation noise between two pitch mechanisms.
    Micheyl C; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3038-50. PubMed ID: 15603149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination.
    Shackleton TM; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3529-40. PubMed ID: 8046144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceived continuity and pitch perception.
    Plack CJ; White LJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1162-9. PubMed ID: 11008817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency and intensity difference limens for harmonics within complex tones.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Shailer MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Feb; 75(2):550-61. PubMed ID: 6699293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch.
    Cariani PA; Delgutte B
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 76(3):1717-34. PubMed ID: 8890287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pitch perception: dissociating frequency from fundamental-frequency discrimination.
    Oxenham AJ; Micheyl C
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():137-45. PubMed ID: 23716218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pitch Discrimination in Musicians and Non-Musicians: Effects of Harmonic Resolvability and Processing Effort.
    Bianchi F; Santurette S; Wendt D; Dau T
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Feb; 17(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 26637239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resolvability of components in complex tones and implications for theories of pitch perception.
    Moore BC; Gockel HE
    Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 276(1-2):88-97. PubMed ID: 21236327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intensity discrimination as a function of level and frequency and its relation to high-frequency hearing.
    Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Nov; 74(5):1375-9. PubMed ID: 6643849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An autocorrelation model with place dependence to account for the effect of harmonic number on fundamental frequency discrimination.
    Bernstein JG; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jun; 117(6):3816-31. PubMed ID: 16018484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of frequency discrimination thresholds for complex and single tones in chinchillas.
    Shofner WP
    Hear Res; 2000 Nov; 149(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 11033250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal processing of the pitch of complex tones.
    White LJ; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2051-63. PubMed ID: 9566327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection and F0 discrimination of harmonic complex tones in the presence of competing tones or noise.
    Micheyl C; Bernstein JG; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Sep; 120(3):1493-505. PubMed ID: 17004471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.