These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17225426)

  • 1. Vowel recognition via cochlear implants and noise vocoders: effects of formant movement and duration.
    Iverson P; Smith CA; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3998-4006. PubMed ID: 17225426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration.
    Iverson P; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2842-54. PubMed ID: 18189574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.
    Sagi E; Svirsky MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1027. PubMed ID: 28253672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Doyle KJ; Danhauer JL; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC; Poroy O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users.
    Perkell JS; Denny M; Lane H; Guenther F; Matthies ML; Tiede M; Vick J; Zandipour M; Burton E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):505-18. PubMed ID: 17297804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in vowel quality in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant users.
    Langereis MC; Bosman AJ; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1997; 36(5):279-97. PubMed ID: 9305524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Language-specific, hearing-related changes in vowel spaces: a preliminary study of English- and Spanish-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Perkell J; Numa W; Vick J; Lane H; Balkany T; Gould J
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):461-70. PubMed ID: 11770669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of changes in hearing status in cochlear implant users on the acoustic vowel space and CV coarticulation.
    Lane H; Matthies M; Perkell J; Vick J; Zandipour M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 44(3):552-63. PubMed ID: 11407560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Synthetic vowel studies on cochlear implant patients.
    Tong YC; Lim HH; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):876-87. PubMed ID: 3183206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the function of phonetic perceptual phenomena within speech recognition: an examination of the perception of /d/-/t/ by adult cochlear implant users.
    Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):1056-64. PubMed ID: 12597198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phoneme recognition and confusions with multichannel cochlear implants: vowels.
    Välimaa TT; Määttä TK; Löppönen HJ; Sorri MJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):1039-54. PubMed ID: 12381059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandarin compound vowels produced by prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Yang J; Xu L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 97():143-149. PubMed ID: 28483225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The recognition of vowels differing by a single formant by cochlear-implant subjects.
    Tyler RS; Tye-Murray N; Otto SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2107-12. PubMed ID: 2532227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Covariation of cochlear implant users' perception and production of vowel contrasts and their identification by listeners with normal hearing.
    Vick JC; Lane H; Perkell JS; Matthies ML; Gould J; Zandipour M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 44(6):1257-67. PubMed ID: 11776363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in vowel quality after cochlear implantation.
    Schenk BS; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2003; 65(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 12925820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of static and dynamic vowel cues by multichannel cochlear implant users.
    Kirk KI; Tye-Murray N; Hurtig RR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3487-98. PubMed ID: 1619125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.