These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17225506)

  • 1. Priming or executive control? Associative priming of cue encoding increases "switch costs" in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1250-9. PubMed ID: 17225506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 16724782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Arrington CM; Logan GD
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Sep; 32(6):965-78. PubMed ID: 15673184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: tasks or cues?
    Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):794-9. PubMed ID: 17328375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological and empirical issues when dissociating cue-related from task-related processes in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Forstmann BU; Brass M; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2007 Jul; 71(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 16397813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Very clever homunculus: compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Logan GD; Bundesen C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Oct; 11(5):832-40. PubMed ID: 15732691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contextual control over task-set retrieval.
    Crump MJ; Logan GD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2047-53. PubMed ID: 21097849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: does foil context matter?
    Goh WD; Tan H
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1063-79. PubMed ID: 17128605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    Psychol Res; 2010 Sep; 74(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 20037766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval?
    Forrest CL; Monsell S; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1002-24. PubMed ID: 24564543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual and conceptual priming of cue encoding in task switching.
    Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1112-26. PubMed ID: 26766605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.
    Koch I; Allport A
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):433-44. PubMed ID: 16752606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?
    Altmann EM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 15327633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Still clever after all these years: searching for the homunculus in explicitly cued task switching.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):978-94. PubMed ID: 17683241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repetition priming mediated by task similarity in semantic classification.
    Xiong MJ; Franks JJ; Logan GD
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1009-20. PubMed ID: 14704016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sandwich priming: a method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects.
    Lupker SJ; Davis CJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):618-39. PubMed ID: 19379040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.