These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17225515)

  • 1. Distinctiveness revisited: unpredictable temporal isolation does not benefit short-term serial recall of heard or seen events.
    Nimmo LM; Lewandowsky S
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1368-75. PubMed ID: 17225515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Serial recall and presentation schedule: a micro-analysis of local distinctiveness.
    Lewandowsky S; Brown GD
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):283-92. PubMed ID: 15948613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From brief gaps to very long pauses: temporal isolation does not benefit serial recall.
    Nimmo LM; Lewandowsky S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Dec; 12(6):999-1004. PubMed ID: 16615319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Serial recall of colors: Two models of memory for serial order applied to continuous visual stimuli.
    Peteranderl S; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28741252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple roles for time in short-term memory: evidence from serial recall of order and timing.
    Farrell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):128-45. PubMed ID: 18194059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for auditory temporal distinctiveness: modality effects in order and frequency judgments.
    Glenberg AM; Fernandez A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):728-39. PubMed ID: 2972805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How verbal memory loads consume attention.
    Chen Z; Cowan N
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):829-36. PubMed ID: 19679862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Local temporal distinctiveness does not benefit auditory verbal and spatial serial recall.
    Parmentier FB; King S; Dennis I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Jun; 13(3):458-65. PubMed ID: 17048731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.
    Beaman CP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):371-89. PubMed ID: 12047050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Explanations of grouping in immediate ordered recall.
    Frick RW
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):551-62. PubMed ID: 2796740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness: a new approach to the irrelevant speech effect.
    LeCompte DC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1154-65. PubMed ID: 8805820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for time-based models of free recall.
    Brown GD; Morin C; Lewandowsky S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Aug; 13(4):717-23. PubMed ID: 17201375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model?
    Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):736-49. PubMed ID: 16060777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modality effects in delayed free recall and recognition: visual is better than auditory.
    Penney CG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 Aug; 41(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 2798920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the word length effect in STM entirely attributable to output delay? Evidence from serial recognition.
    Baddeley A; Chincotta D; Stafford L; Turk D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):353-69. PubMed ID: 12047049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spacing and lag effects in free recall of pure lists.
    Kahana MJ; Howard MW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):159-64. PubMed ID: 15948289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of temporal coding: auditory-visual comparisons.
    Schab FR; Crowder RG
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):384-97. PubMed ID: 2761399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional characteristics of auditory temporal-spatial short-term memory: evidence from serial order errors.
    Parmentier FB; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jan; 26(1):222-38. PubMed ID: 10682299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.