These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
689 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17227185)
41. A dual-process account of auditory change detection. McAnally KI; Martin RL; Eramudugolla R; Stuart GW; Irvine DR; Mattingley JB J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Aug; 36(4):994-1004. PubMed ID: 20695713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic. Heathcote A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1210-30. PubMed ID: 14622056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy. Tussing AA; Greene RL Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 11258228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Dissociating recollection from familiarity: electrophysiological evidence that familiarity for faces is associated with a posterior old/new effect. MacKenzie G; Donaldson DI Neuroimage; 2007 Jun; 36(2):454-63. PubMed ID: 17451972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Recognition memory zROC slopes for items with correct versus incorrect source decisions discriminate the dual process and unequal variance signal detection models. Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Hautus MJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1205-25. PubMed ID: 24820667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval. Voss JL; Paller KA Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):280-9. PubMed ID: 19457375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Recognition memory for source and occurrence: the importance of recollection. Quamme JR; Frederick C; Kroll NE; Yonelinas AP; Dobbins IG Mem Cognit; 2002 Sep; 30(6):893-907. PubMed ID: 12450093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. How many response options? A study of remember-know testing procedures. Bruno D; Rutherford A Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 20137771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: the case of recognition memory. Kellen D; Klauer KC; Singmann H Psychol Rev; 2012 Jul; 119(3):457-79. PubMed ID: 22468607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004). Murdock B Psychol Rev; 2006 Jul; 113(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 16802885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Word-imagery effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. O'Neill W Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Jun; 100(3 Pt 1):716-22. PubMed ID: 16060432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Context effects in recognition memory: the role of familiarity and recollection. McKenzie WA; Tiberghien G Conscious Cogn; 2004 Mar; 13(1):20-38. PubMed ID: 14990238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The nature of recollection in behavior and the brain. Slotnick SD Neuroreport; 2013 Aug; 24(12):663-70. PubMed ID: 23719019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [ROC and z-ROC parameters in word memory: experimental and pre-experimental effects]. Pelegrina M; Tejeiro R Psicothema; 2006 Feb; 18(1):160-4. PubMed ID: 17296026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Recognition ROCs are curvilinear-or are they? On premature arguments against the two-high-threshold model of recognition. Bröder A; Schütz J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):587-606. PubMed ID: 19379038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Slotnick SD; Dodson CS Mem Cognit; 2005 Jan; 33(1):151-70. PubMed ID: 15915801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]