37 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17227210)
1. Susceptibility of Lactobacillus plantarum strains to six antibiotics and definition of new susceptibility-resistance cutoff values.
Flórez AB; Egervärn M; Danielsen M; Tosi L; Morelli L; Lindgren S; Mayo B
Microb Drug Resist; 2006; 12(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 17227210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A critical issue on microbiological cut-off value of ampicillin resistance in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum.
Wu M; Tarrah A; Ghion G; Pakroo S; Giacomini A; Corich V
J Appl Microbiol; 2023 Mar; 134(3):. PubMed ID: 36906284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactobacillus rhamnosus.
Korhonen JM; Van Hoek AH; Saarela M; Huys G; Tosi L; Mayrhofer S; Wright AV
Benef Microbes; 2010 Mar; 1(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21831752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification and characterization of antibiotic resistance genes in Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus plantarum.
Egervärn M; Roos S; Lindmark H
J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Nov; 107(5):1658-68. PubMed ID: 19457037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antibiotic susceptibility of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus species.
Charteris WP; Kelly PM; Morelli L; Collins JK
J Food Prot; 1998 Dec; 61(12):1636-43. PubMed ID: 9874341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Probiotic Potential and Safety Assessment of
Liu B; Zhong X; Liu Z; Guan X; Wang Q; Qi R; Zhou X; Huang J
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Dec; 24(24):. PubMed ID: 38139398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A case of
Bapna M; Maurer J; Ruddy S; Karnik K; Turett G; Urban C; Yoon J; Prasad N; Yung L; Lang S; Mack C; Volodarskiy A; Aksenov S; Segal-Maurer S
IDCases; 2023; 32():e01806. PubMed ID: 37250380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical guidance - Update of the criteria used in the assessment of bacterial resistance to antibiotics of human or veterinary importance.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
EFSA J; 2008 Jul; 6(7):732. PubMed ID: 37213835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Phenotypic and Safety Assessment of the Cheese Strain
Flórez AB; Vázquez L; Rodríguez J; Mayo B
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Dec; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36614048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Tetracycline Resistance and Determination of the Tentative Microbiological Cutoff Values in Lactic Acid Bacterial Species.
Ma Q; Pei Z; Fang Z; Wang H; Zhu J; Lee YK; Zhang H; Zhao J; Lu W; Chen W
Microorganisms; 2021 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 34683449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety Assessment of
Kwon YJ; Chun BH; Jung HS; Chu J; Joung H; Park SY; Kim BK; Jeon CO
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):1420-1429. PubMed ID: 34373437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains of Potential Use as Feed Additives - The Basic Safety and Usefulness Criterion.
Stefańska I; Kwiecień E; Jóźwiak-Piasecka K; Garbowska M; Binek M; Rzewuska M
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():687071. PubMed ID: 34277757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the effects of
Soleymanzadeh Moghadam S; Mohammad N; Ghooshchian M; FathiZadeh S; Khodaii Z; Faramarzi M; Fagheei Aghmiyuni Z; Roudbari M; Pazouki A; Mousavi Shabestari T
Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2020; 34():94. PubMed ID: 33315993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Laboratory Evolution Assays and Whole-Genome Sequencing for the Development and Safety Evaluation of
Dong Y; Zhang F; Wang B; Gao J; Zhang J; Shao Y
Front Microbiol; 2019; 10():1235. PubMed ID: 31231332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Genomic Analysis of
Evanovich E; de Souza Mendonça Mattos PJ; Guerreiro JF
Int J Genomics; 2019; 2019():4973214. PubMed ID: 31093491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probiotic potential and safety properties of Lactobacillus plantarum from Slovak Bryndza cheese.
Belicová A; Mikulášová M; Dušinský R
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():760298. PubMed ID: 24093103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization and transfer of antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria from fermented food products.
Nawaz M; Wang J; Zhou A; Ma C; Wu X; Moore JE; Millar BC; Xu J
Curr Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 62(3):1081-9. PubMed ID: 21212956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra- and interlaboratory performances of two commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for bifidobacteria and nonenterococcal lactic acid bacteria.
Huys G; D'Haene K; Cnockaert M; Tosi L; Danielsen M; Flórez AB; Mättö J; Axelsson L; Korhonen J; Mayrhofer S; Egervärn M; Giacomini M; Vandamme P
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2010 Jun; 54(6):2567-74. PubMed ID: 20385863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microcultures of lactic acid bacteria: characterization and selection of strains, optimization of nutrients and gallic acid concentration.
Guzmán-López O; Loera O; Parada JL; Castillo-Morales A; Martínez-Ramírez C; Augur C; Gaime-Perraud I; Saucedo-Castañeda G
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 18800233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
