489 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17227644)
1. Evolution of multiple disease screening in Keelung: a model for community involvement in health interventions?
Wang PE; Wang TT; Chiu YH; Yen AM; Chen TH
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S54-8. PubMed ID: 17227644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Community-based multiple screening model: design, implementation, and analysis of 42,387 participants.
Chen TH; Chiu YH; Luh DL; Yen MF; Wu HM; Chen LS; Tung TH; Huang CC; Chan CC; Shiu MN; Yeh YP; Liou HH; Liao CS; Lai HC; Chiang CP; Peng HL; Tseng CD; Yen MS; Hsu WC; Chen CH;
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(8):1734-43. PubMed ID: 15073864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood test within a multiple disease screening programme: an experience from Keelung, Taiwan.
Yang KC; Liao CS; Chiu YH; Yen AM; Chen TH
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 17227635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health information system for community-based multiple screening in Keelung, Taiwan (Keelung Community-based Integrated Screening No. 3).
Chiu YH; Chen LS; Chan CC; Liou DM; Wu SC; Kuo HS; Chang HJ; Chen TH
Int J Med Inform; 2006 May; 75(5):369-83. PubMed ID: 16129660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.
Koong SL; Yen AM; Chen TH
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 17227642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Community-based cancer screening programs in older populations: making progress but can we do better?
Curbow B; Bowie J; Garza MA; McDonnell K; Scott LB; Coyne CA; Chiappelli T
Prev Med; 2004 Jun; 38(6):676-93. PubMed ID: 15193888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a pilot study for breast and cervical cancer screening with Bradford's minority ethnic women; a community development approach, 1991-93.
Kernohan EE
Br J Cancer Suppl; 1996 Sep; 29():S42-6. PubMed ID: 8782798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Collecting direct non-health care and time cost data: application to screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer.
Cantor SB; Levy LB; Cárdenas-Turanzas M; Basen-Engquist K; Le T; Beck JR; Follen M
Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 16751325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A community-based epidemiological study of periodontal disease in Keelung, Taiwan: a model from Keelung community-based integrated screening programme (KCIS No. 18).
Lai H; Lo MT; Wang PE; Wang TT; Chen TH; Wu GH
J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Oct; 34(10):851-9. PubMed ID: 17711479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of a community-based screening programme for chronic atrial fibrillation in Japan.
Maeda K; Shimbo T; Fukui T
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 15153326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening, prevention and treatment of cervical cancer -- a global and regional generalized cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ginsberg GM; Edejer TT; Lauer JA; Sepulveda C
Vaccine; 2009 Oct; 27(43):6060-79. PubMed ID: 19647813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Socioeconomic status and cancer screening.
Segnan N
IARC Sci Publ; 1997; (138):369-76. PubMed ID: 9353678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic analysis of outreach assessment clinics in breast screening programmes.
van der Pol MM; Cairns JA; Gilbert FJ; Hendry PJ
Int J Health Plann Manage; 1999; 14(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 10351680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adherence to cervical and breast cancer programs is crucial to improving screening performance.
Mauad EC; Nicolau SM; Moreira LF; Haikel RL; Longatto-Filho A; Baracat EC
Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1241. PubMed ID: 19778158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Costs and effects of alternative screening programs against cervical cancer].
Gyrd-Hansen D; Hølund B; Andersen P
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Aug; 158(35):4912-5. PubMed ID: 8801698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevention of cervical cancer with screening programme in Branicevo District and cost-effectiveness analysis adjusted to the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
Perovic S
J BUON; 2009; 14(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19373953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in predictors of cervical and breast cancer screening by screening need in uninsured Latino women.
Buki LP; Jamison J; Anderson CJ; Cuadra AM
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 110(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 17696119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Ekwueme DU; Hall IJ; Richardson LC; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Thompson TD
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 18536027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
