181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17227923)
1. How are decisions to introduce new surgical technologies made? Advanced laparoscopic surgery at a Canadian community hospital: A qualitative case study and evaluation.
Sharma B; Danjoux NM; Harnish JL; Urbach DR
Surg Innov; 2006 Dec; 13(4):250-6. PubMed ID: 17227923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Priority setting in a hospital critical care unit: qualitative case study.
Mielke J; Martin DK; Singer PA
Crit Care Med; 2003 Dec; 31(12):2764-8. PubMed ID: 14668612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospital priority setting with an appeals process: a qualitative case study and evaluation.
Madden S; Martin DK; Downey S; Singer PA
Health Policy; 2005 Jul; 73(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 15911053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Priority-setting and hospital strategic planning: a qualitative case study.
Martin D; Shulman K; Santiago-Sorrell P; Singer P
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Oct; 8(4):197-201. PubMed ID: 14596753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation.
Danjoux NM; Martin DK; Lehoux PN; Harnish JL; Shaul RZ; Bernstein M; Urbach DR
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Nov; 7():182. PubMed ID: 18005409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Priority setting and cardiac surgery: a qualitative case study.
Walton NA; Martin DK; Peter EH; Pringle DM; Singer PA
Health Policy; 2007 Mar; 80(3):444-58. PubMed ID: 16757057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SARS and hospital priority setting: a qualitative case study and evaluation.
Bell JA; Hyland S; DePellegrin T; Upshur RE; Bernstein M; Martin DK
BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 4(1):36. PubMed ID: 15606924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers.
Greenberg D; Peterburg Y; Vekstein D; Pliskin JS
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 15921062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health care technology assessment and adoption: a case study.
Veluchamy S; Alder HC
Hosp Technol Ser; 1989 May; 8(13):1-12. PubMed ID: 10304477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Priority setting at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels in Canada, Norway and Uganda.
Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
Health Policy; 2007 Jun; 82(1):78-94. PubMed ID: 17034898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Priority setting in hospitals: fairness, inclusiveness, and the problem of institutional power differences.
Gibson JL; Martin DK; Singer PA
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 61(11):2355-62. PubMed ID: 15950347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The changing nature of nursing work in rural and small community hospitals.
Montour A; Baumann A; Blythe J; Hunsberger M
Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(1):1089. PubMed ID: 19199373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?
Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):766-73. PubMed ID: 19070414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework.
Maluka S; Kamuzora P; San Sebastiån M; Byskov J; Olsen ØE; Shayo E; Ndawi B; Hurtig AK
Soc Sci Med; 2010 Aug; 71(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 20554365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seasonal bed closures in an intensive care unit: a qualitative study.
Rocker GM; Cook DJ; Martin DK; Singer PA
J Crit Care; 2003 Mar; 18(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12640610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Priority setting for high cost medications (HCMs) in public hospitals in Australia: a case study.
Gallego G; Taylor SJ; Brien JA
Health Policy; 2007 Nov; 84(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 17618009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Introducing priority setting and resource allocation in home and community care programs.
Urquhart B; Mitton C; Peacock S
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2008 Jan; 13 Suppl 1():41-5. PubMed ID: 18325168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?
Reeleder D; Martin DK; Keresztes C; Singer PA
BMC Health Serv Res; 2005 Jan; 5(1):8. PubMed ID: 15663792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors affecting decisions to adopt medical technologies in acute care hospitals.
Friedman LH; Myrtle RC
J Health Hum Serv Adm; 1996; 18(4):466-89. PubMed ID: 10162199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethics and economics: does programme budgeting and marginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting?
Gibson J; Mitton C; Martin D; Donaldson C; Singer P
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2006 Jan; 11(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 16378530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
