These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17228117)

  • 1. Influence of dose engine accuracy on the optimum dose distribution in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment plans.
    Soukup M; Alber M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):725-40. PubMed ID: 17228117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A finite size pencil beam algorithm for IMRT dose optimization: density corrections.
    Jeleń U; Alber M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):617-33. PubMed ID: 17228109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I; Ahmad S
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainty reduction in intensity modulated proton therapy by inverse Monte Carlo treatment planning.
    Morávek Z; Rickhey M; Hartmann M; Bogner L
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4803-19. PubMed ID: 19622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water.
    Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4967-80. PubMed ID: 16985281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
    Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comprehensive dosimetric study of Monte Carlo and pencil-beam algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer.
    Liang X; Li Z; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Rutenberg M; Mendenhall N
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 30488548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of MLC leaf position errors on simple and complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
    Mu G; Ludlum E; Xia P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 18182688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo dose calculations for spot scanned proton therapy.
    Tourovsky A; Lomax AJ; Schneider U; Pedroni E
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):971-81. PubMed ID: 15798269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo-based dosimetry of head-and-neck patients treated with SIB-IMRT.
    Sakthi N; Keall P; Mihaylov I; Wu Q; Wu Y; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich R; Siebers JV
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Mar; 64(3):968-77. PubMed ID: 16458782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
    Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of a hybrid Monte Carlo-Pencil Beam dose algorithm for proton therapy inverse planning.
    Barragán Montero AM; Souris K; Sanchez-Parcerisa D; Sterpin E; Lee JA
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):846-862. PubMed ID: 29159915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reduced-order parameter optimization for simplifying prostate IMRT planning.
    Lu R; Radke RJ; Happersett L; Yang J; Chui CS; Yorke E; Jackson A
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):849-70. PubMed ID: 17228125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of a hybrid MC dose algorithm for IMRT optimization dose evaluation.
    Siebers JV; Kawrakow I; Ramakrishnan V
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2853-63. PubMed ID: 17821993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of the dose calculation accuracy for IMRT in lung: a 2D approach.
    Dvorak P; Stock M; Kroupa B; Bogner J; Georg D
    Acta Oncol; 2007; 46(7):928-36. PubMed ID: 17917824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MMCTP: a radiotherapy research environment for Monte Carlo and patient-specific treatment planning.
    Alexander A; Deblois F; Stroian G; Al-Yahya K; Heath E; Seuntjens J
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):N297-308. PubMed ID: 17664568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
    Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coordinate transformations for BEAM/EGSnrc Monte Carlo dose calculations of non-coplanar fields received from a DICOM-compliant treatment planning system.
    Thebaut J; Zavgorodni S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):N441-9. PubMed ID: 17110762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.