BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17228117)

  • 1. Influence of dose engine accuracy on the optimum dose distribution in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment plans.
    Soukup M; Alber M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):725-40. PubMed ID: 17228117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A finite size pencil beam algorithm for IMRT dose optimization: density corrections.
    Jeleń U; Alber M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):617-33. PubMed ID: 17228109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I; Ahmad S
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainty reduction in intensity modulated proton therapy by inverse Monte Carlo treatment planning.
    Morávek Z; Rickhey M; Hartmann M; Bogner L
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4803-19. PubMed ID: 19622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water.
    Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4967-80. PubMed ID: 16985281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
    Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comprehensive dosimetric study of Monte Carlo and pencil-beam algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer.
    Liang X; Li Z; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Rutenberg M; Mendenhall N
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 30488548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of MLC leaf position errors on simple and complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
    Mu G; Ludlum E; Xia P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 18182688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo dose calculations for spot scanned proton therapy.
    Tourovsky A; Lomax AJ; Schneider U; Pedroni E
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):971-81. PubMed ID: 15798269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo-based dosimetry of head-and-neck patients treated with SIB-IMRT.
    Sakthi N; Keall P; Mihaylov I; Wu Q; Wu Y; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich R; Siebers JV
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Mar; 64(3):968-77. PubMed ID: 16458782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
    Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of a hybrid Monte Carlo-Pencil Beam dose algorithm for proton therapy inverse planning.
    Barragán Montero AM; Souris K; Sanchez-Parcerisa D; Sterpin E; Lee JA
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):846-862. PubMed ID: 29159915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reduced-order parameter optimization for simplifying prostate IMRT planning.
    Lu R; Radke RJ; Happersett L; Yang J; Chui CS; Yorke E; Jackson A
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):849-70. PubMed ID: 17228125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of a hybrid MC dose algorithm for IMRT optimization dose evaluation.
    Siebers JV; Kawrakow I; Ramakrishnan V
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2853-63. PubMed ID: 17821993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of the dose calculation accuracy for IMRT in lung: a 2D approach.
    Dvorak P; Stock M; Kroupa B; Bogner J; Georg D
    Acta Oncol; 2007; 46(7):928-36. PubMed ID: 17917824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MMCTP: a radiotherapy research environment for Monte Carlo and patient-specific treatment planning.
    Alexander A; Deblois F; Stroian G; Al-Yahya K; Heath E; Seuntjens J
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):N297-308. PubMed ID: 17664568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
    Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coordinate transformations for BEAM/EGSnrc Monte Carlo dose calculations of non-coplanar fields received from a DICOM-compliant treatment planning system.
    Thebaut J; Zavgorodni S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):N441-9. PubMed ID: 17110762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.