These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Perspectives on Clinical Therapeutics: a review of the past ten years and a look forward to the next decade. Farrar GE Clin Ther; 1988; 10(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 3273861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. How a submitted manuscript is processed. Peh WC; Ng KH Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Plagiarism in Review. Weems M Pediatr Rev; 2017 Jan; 38(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 28044028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. It's Time We Fix the Peer Review System. Malcom D Am J Pharm Educ; 2018 Jun; 82(5):7144. PubMed ID: 30013250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Peer review: A critical cog in the scholarship wheel. Zavod RM Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018; 10(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29248064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow? Sosa JA; Mehta P; Thomas DC; Berland G; Gross C; McNamara RL; Rosenthal R; Udelsman R; Bravata DM; Roman SA Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19561471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Peer review in medical publishing--how to streamline the system. Kochar MS Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1984 Oct; 4(9):6. PubMed ID: 10269285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The ethics of peer review. Southgate DA Br J Nutr; 1992 May; 67(3):303-4. PubMed ID: 1622973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The factors considered by editors of plastic surgery journals in evaluating submitted manuscripts. Caulfield RH; Maleki-Tabrizi A; Pleat JM; Tyler MP Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2008 Mar; 32(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 18058163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. President's Pen-Publishing with a growth mindset. Scott Tilley D Res Nurs Health; 2020 Aug; 43(4):302. PubMed ID: 32515866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Peer review in health sciences. Das T Indian J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 50(2):79. PubMed ID: 12194582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Is anonymous peer review the best way to review and accept manuscripts? Altura BT Magnes Trace Elem; 1990; 9(3):117-8. PubMed ID: 2248691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]