BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17229867)

  • 21. In vitro susceptibility pattern of cephalosporin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.
    Punpanich W; Tantichattanon W; Wongwatcharapaiboon S; Treeratweeraphong V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Oct; 91 Suppl 3():S21-7. PubMed ID: 19255989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of the activity of beta-lactams against Pseudomonas aeruginosa according to phenotypes of resistance].
    Bert F; Briaud I; Branger C; Lambert-Zechovsky N
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1996 May; 44(5):329-32. PubMed ID: 8758469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance of VITEK-2 Compact and overnight MicroScan panels for direct identification and susceptibility testing of Gram-negative bacilli from positive FAN BacT/ALERT blood culture bottles.
    Quesada MD; Giménez M; Molinos S; Fernández G; Sánchez MD; Rivelo R; Ramírez A; Banqué G; Ausina V
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2010 Feb; 16(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 19778301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of in vitro activities of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam against aerobic bacterial pathogens from patients with nosocomial infections.
    Huang SS; Lee SC; Lee N; See LC; Tsai MH; Shieh WB
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2007 Apr; 40(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 17446961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Vitek2 and BD Phoenix in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Jekarl DW; Han SB; Kim YJ; Shin SH; Park KG; Park JJ; Han K; Park YJ
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Aug; 67(4):384-6. PubMed ID: 20638609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of workflow and accuracy of identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococci by Vitek 2 and routine methods.
    Rantakokko-Jalava K; Elo-Lehtonen E; Meurman O
    APMIS; 2006 Jan; 114(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16499660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Different antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to detect ertapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: VITEK2, MicroScan, Etest, disk diffusion, and broth microdilution.
    Lee M; Chung HS
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 May; 112():87-91. PubMed ID: 25794901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Resistance to newer beta-lactams and related ESBL types in gram-negative nosocomial isolates in Turkish hospitals: results of the multicentre HITIT study].
    Gür D; Gülay Z; Akan OA; Aktaş Z; Kayacan CB; Cakici O; Eraç B; Gültekin M; Oğünç D; Söyletir G; Unal N; Uysal S
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2008 Oct; 42(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 19149074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparison between agar dilution and three other methods for determining the susceptibility of 228 clinical isolates of non-fermenting gram-negative rods].
    Gómez-Garcés JL; Aracil B; Gil Y
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2009 Jun; 27(6):331-7. PubMed ID: 19406523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of carbapenems: multicenter validity testing and accuracy levels of five antimicrobial test methods for detecting resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.
    Steward CD; Mohammed JM; Swenson JM; Stocker SA; Williams PP; Gaynes RP; McGowan JE; Tenover FC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Jan; 41(1):351-8. PubMed ID: 12517872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Performance evaluation of VITEK 2 system in meropenem susceptibility testing of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates].
    Acuner IC; Bayramoğlu G; Birinci A; Cekiç Cihan C; Bek Y; Durupınar B
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jul; 45(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 21935774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of phenotypic tests for the detection of metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a low prevalence country.
    Samuelsen O; Buarø L; Giske CG; Simonsen GS; Aasnaes B; Sundsfjord A
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Apr; 61(4):827-30. PubMed ID: 18227087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance of Vitek 2 in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with different mechanisms of beta-lactam resistance.
    Mazzariol A; Aldegheri M; Ligozzi M; Lo Cascio G; Koncan R; Fontana R
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 46(6):2095-8. PubMed ID: 18434562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Drug susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of streptococci and enterococci by the Phoenix automated microbiology system.
    Brigante GR; Luzzaro FA; Pini B; Lombardi G; Sokeng G; Toniolo AQ
    BMC Microbiol; 2007 May; 7():46. PubMed ID: 17521437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Pseudomonas aeruginosa and beta-lactam antibiotics at the time of Europe].
    Cavallo JD; Mérens A
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2008; 56(7-8):435-8. PubMed ID: 19019568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Potential impact of the VITEK 2 system and the Advanced Expert System on the clinical laboratory of a university-based hospital.
    Sanders CC; Peyret M; Moland ES; Cavalieri SJ; Shubert C; Thomson KS; Boeufgras JM; Sanders WE
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 39(7):2379-85. PubMed ID: 11427542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Antibiotic susceptibility and mechanisms of beta-lactam resistance among clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: first report in Algeria.
    Drissi M; Ahmed ZB; Dehecq B; Bakour R; Plésiat P; Hocquet D
    Med Mal Infect; 2008 Apr; 38(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 18395380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a tertiary care hospital.
    Raja NS; Singh NN
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2007 Feb; 40(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 17332906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Influence of the mixed inoculum on the species-identification and antimicrobial susceptibility test results by the automated microbial systems].
    Higa M; Kisanuki K; Yamane N; Nakasone I
    Rinsho Byori; 2008 Apr; 56(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 18516962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of applying the new Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam and imipenem susceptibility breakpoints for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Hong Kong.
    Ho PL; Chow KH; Tse H; Cheng VC
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2012 Sep; 40(3):280-1. PubMed ID: 22795656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.