498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17230159)
1. Misconduct? It's all academic..
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Repairing research integrity.
Titus SL; Wells JA; Rhoades LJ
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):980-2. PubMed ID: 18563131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Policing integrity.
Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):248. PubMed ID: 15902211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct.
Wadman M
Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Confidentiality is essential in misconduct inquiries.
Mason S; Rutledge C
Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7135):492. PubMed ID: 17392764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Misconduct mayhem.
Powell K
Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):122-3. PubMed ID: 16721916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
Mello MM; Brennan TA
N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. PhD--club or history?
Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6994):789. PubMed ID: 15215821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientists behaving badly.
Martinson BC; Anderson MS; de Vries R
Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):737-8. PubMed ID: 15944677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An unwelcome discovery. Walter DeNino was a young lab technician who analyzed data for his mentor, Eric Poehlman. What he found was that Poehlman was not the scientist he appeared to be.
Interlandi J
N Y Times Mag; 2006 Oct; ():98-103. PubMed ID: 17115505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics and fraud.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):117-8. PubMed ID: 16407910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. If you can lose a driving licence, why not a PhD?
Hart AG
Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6999):503. PubMed ID: 15282578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
Sovacool BK
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Named and shamed.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2006 May; 441(7092):392-3. PubMed ID: 16724027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sitting in judgement.
Check E
Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Conflict of interest. Stung by controversy, biomedical groups urge consistent guidelines.
Kaiser J
Science; 2007 Jul; 317(5837):441. PubMed ID: 17656694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Japan ponders steps to probe data errors.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6914):348. PubMed ID: 12459746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Universities scramble to assess scope of falsified results.
Dalton R
Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7064):7. PubMed ID: 16267515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Solutions, not scapegoats.
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):957. PubMed ID: 18563095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
