498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17230159)
21. Purdue dogged by misconduct claims.
Reich ES
Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):238-9. PubMed ID: 17507941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Meyer: disagreements but no misconduct.
Vences M; Zardoya R
Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Research ethics: Zero tolerance.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2012 Jan; 481(7380):134-6. PubMed ID: 22237090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Scientific misconduct. Japan's universities take action.
Normile D
Science; 2007 Jan; 315(5808):26. PubMed ID: 17204614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat.
Bentley P
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Harassment should count as scientific misconduct.
Marín-Spiotta E
Nature; 2018 May; 557(7704):141. PubMed ID: 29743701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Need for a court to rule on patents and misconduct.
Bihain BE
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6951):875. PubMed ID: 12931157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth.
Dalton R
Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):728-9. PubMed ID: 12490902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Stop ignoring misconduct.
Kornfeld DS; Titus SL
Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7618):29-30. PubMed ID: 27582206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Meyer case poses a challenge to the system.
Málaga-Trillo E; Gerlach G
Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Doubts over biochemist's data expose holes in Japanese fraud laws.
Fuyuno I; Cyranoski D
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):514. PubMed ID: 16452938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Wittmaack K
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Collateral damage.
Nature; 2010 Aug; 466(7310):1023. PubMed ID: 20739963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Research integrity: Sabotage!
Maher B
Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7315):516-8. PubMed ID: 20881988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Quarrel over book leads to call for misconduct inquiry.
Dalton R
Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):889. PubMed ID: 15496886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.
Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Publish or perish.
Nature; 2015 May; 521(7552):259. PubMed ID: 25993920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Whistles blow in vain on bad practice in German research.
Abbott A
Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):218. PubMed ID: 14628012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):171. PubMed ID: 29895918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Cancer researcher found guilty of negligence.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):258. PubMed ID: 12447407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
